Re: 20010606: install netcdf v3.5.0 (fwd)

------- Forwarded Message

Date:    Wed, 06 Jun 2001 15:38:12 -0500
From:    "Jonathan E. Thom" <address@hidden>
To:      Russ Rew <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: 20010606: install netcdf v3.5.0

Russ,
That appeared to work. Thanks for the help.
Jonathan.


Russ Rew wrote:

> >To: address@hidden
> >cc: address@hidden
> >From: Jonathan Thom <address@hidden>
> >Organization: UCAR/Unidata
> >Keywords: 200106061620.f56GKip28418, netcdf.mod fortran-90 f90 solaris-6
>
> Jonathan,
>
> > Here is a listing of the src/f90 directory. To my dismay there are no .mod
> > files.
> >
> > Makefile
> > NOTES
> > Readme
> > example.cdl
> > example.nc
> > example_good.cdl
> > f90aux.m4
> > gen.m4
> > netcdf.3f90
> > netcdf.M
> > netcdf.f90
> > netcdf.o
> > netcdf_attributes.f90
> > netcdf_constants.f90
> > netcdf_dims.f90
> > netcdf_expanded.f90
> > netcdf_externals.f90
> > netcdf_file.f90
> > netcdf_overloads.f90
> > netcdf_test*
> > netcdf_test.f90
> > netcdf_text_variables.f90
> > netcdf_variables.f90
> > netcdf_visibility.f90
> > nvea.m4
> > nves.m4
> > typeSizes.M
> > typeSizes.f90
> > typeSizes.o
>
> OK, it looks like the Solaris 6 Fortran 90 compiler you are using
> created the module file at "netcdf.M" instead of "netcdf.mod".
> Perhaps your Sun Fortran-90 compiler is old enough that there were no
> established conventions yet for compiled module names, or maybe our
> assumption that all Fortran-90 compilers will produce their module
> output as "*.mod" files is incorrect.  In any case, just try renaming
> or copying netcdf.M to netcdf.mod and then see if "make install" works.
> I notice it also created the module typesizes.M instead of
> typesizes.mod, but that's not an installed file so probably doesn't
> have to be renamed.
>
> --Russ

------- End of Forwarded Message