[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ncvarget and array reordering

This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.

  • Subject: Re: ncvarget and array reordering
  • Date: Tue, 19 Jul 94 12:20:05 -0600
>Date: Thu, 16 Jun 1994 15:02:07 -0600 (MDT) 
>From: address@hidden (Ethan Alpert)
>To: address@hidden
>Subject: ncvarget and array reordering 

In the above message you wrote:

>The whole idea here is, if negative edge lengths were allowed, then user
>defined reorderings of data durring reads and writes would be possible.
>Saving both programing time and CPU time.

I believe that this can be done using generalized hyperslab I/O, though,
admittedly, this wouldn't be as convenient as using negative edge
lengths in regular hyperslab I/O.

--------
Steve Emmerson   <address@hidden>