> All, > > For completeness, I did get a response on the other thread before this one, > which I'll paste below. I didn't work (I set the range of the two fields I > thought I should in that table very high: rain and rainfall".). You will > find in the data I upload that the difference of the nwm qpesum and the > abrfc qpesum (which is what I'm trying to get the highest resolution plot > of) has a very high end range to begin with (I think the summed masked > region got blown up outside our RFC boundary). When adaptive resolution is > on, I have no problem overcoming that by editing the color table and > setting a range, and also fixing the visible range. No such luck with it > turned off. > I checked your dataset and here is my finding: there are three variables: temperature, precip, and qpesum. You should be able to get what you wanted for temperature and precip, these two variables are in good shaped. There should be no difference between AR and no AR regarding the range of rendering. But QPESum is different since there is zero attribute associated with this variable, no data range, missing value, and other attributes. I don't see why AR will play any role in this variable. The attached image is without AR and I set the color table range to 0 and 1. Yuan > I hit send just as the upload finished FYI. > > BTW, I didn't mean to imply sampling was still on with this feature off, > just wanted to understand how it actually worked when on. > > "If you disable the AR from the preferences, the IDV will keep it until you > changing it back. But you obviously experienced some performance > hit without AR. The AP and weighted average are not tightly related and the > grey box is likely the difference between your data range and the > system default range for this variable. You should be able to change the > range of contour in the control panel. In the IDV, if you select > Tools > Parameter Defaults Editor, you will see the default range of common > used parameters which is used in the rendering. This table is > combined with the Parameter Alias table, and both table can be overwritten > by User defaults. > > Well, you can see the IDV is a powerful tool and a bit complicated. I hope > you can enjoy using it in your research after some learning curve." > > address@hidden> wrote: > > > Hi Mason, > > > > Thanks for your inquiry. Yes, it is always helpful to submit issues as > > separate > > tickets. But the problem we are facing currently is the developer who is in > > charge of adaptive resolution has had a family emergency, and I am not > > sure when > > we are expecting his return to the office. From what you describe, we have > > a > > bug. If you turn off adaptive resolution via edit preferences, and you are > > still > > seeing data sampling then that's a bug. > > > > At any rate, we still may be able to make some progress, but I need a data > > sample. Can you either point me to the data or upload your data file here? > > > > http://motherlode.ucar.edu/repository/alias/idvupload > > > > Let us know when it is uploaded. > > > > Best, > > > > Unidata IDV Support > > > > > > > All, > > > > > > I let a different issue I had open with support drift toward a discussion > > > of this new issue I have now so I get the feeling that's why I have had > > no > > > response in that thread. I'm trying to get the best possible resolution > > in > > > my image, so I don't want the sampling from Adaptive Resolution (AR) > > (does > > > the sampling option in Preferences, Formats & Data control how that is > > > done? Just curious as I'm not sure how the weighted average works with > > > every 8 of 9 points as the legend window says when AR is enabled). > > Anyways, > > > I've played around with the contour range, visible range, using fast > > > rendering and not, system specifications under Preferences (probably many > > > other combinations of things) just trying to get a color shaded plan > > view, > > > and I always get a grey box... contour only seems to work, but not color > > > shading. > > > > > > -- > > > Mason D. Rowell, Hydrometeorologist > > > DOC/NOAA/NWS/ABRFC > > > 10159 E. 11th St., Suite 300 > > > Tulsa, OK 74128 > > > Work: (918) 832 4109 EXT: 354 > > > address@hidden > > > > > > > > > > > > Ticket Details > > =================== > > Ticket ID: JOH-888693 > > Department: Support IDV > > Priority: Normal > > Status: Closed > > =================== > > NOTE: All email exchanges with Unidata User Support are recorded in the > > Unidata inquiry tracking system and then made publicly available through > > the web. If you do not want to have your interactions made available in > > this way, you must let us know in each email you send to us. > > > > > > > > > -- > Mason D. Rowell, Hydrometeorologist > DOC/NOAA/NWS/ABRFC > 10159 E. 11th St., Suite 300 > Tulsa, OK 74128 > Work: (918) 832 4109 EXT: 354 > address@hidden > > Ticket Details =================== Ticket ID: JOH-888693 Department: Support IDV Priority: Normal Status: Open =================== NOTE: All email exchanges with Unidata User Support are recorded in the Unidata inquiry tracking system and then made publicly available through the web. If you do not want to have your interactions made available in this way, you must let us know in each email you send to us.
Attachment:
QPE2.jpg
Description: JPEG image