[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[THREDDS #KNL-571421]: GFS Best Time Series not "best'

This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.

  • Subject: [THREDDS #KNL-571421]: GFS Best Time Series not "best'
  • Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 20:06:39 -0600
Hi Don,

I think we have this fixed now. Let us know when you get a chance to test on 
your end.

Thanks!

Sean

PS: I hope all is well with regards to the floods!

> Thanks, Sean.  Hopefully a solution can be found quickly since it's
> affecting those of us using this for realtime displays or classes.
> 
> Don
> 
> On 9/11/13 12:16 PM, Unidata THREDDS Support wrote:
> > Hi Don,
> >
> > We've tried recreating the index files, but that didn't fix the problem. 
> > This might take
> > some time, as it does not affect all collections and it's not a simple 
> > index issue. John
> > is going to take a look at it to see what he can figure out, but for now we 
> > are not sure
> > what is going on.
> >
> > Cheers!
> >
> > Sean
> >
> >> Any update on this?  It still seems to be screwed up.
> >>
> >> Don
> >>
> >> On 9/9/13 10:15 AM, Unidata THREDDS Support wrote:
> >>> Hi Don,
> >>>
> >>> I see the same thing. For example, if we compare the "best" for the GFS 
> >>> 1.0 degree for
> >>>
> >>> 2013-09-08 18Z, 21Z
> >>>
> >>> with the 2013-09-08 run using
> >>>
> >>> 18Z (analysis), 21Z (3 hour forecast)
> >>>
> >>> the grids turn out to be different (I'm comparing 
> >>> MSLP_Eta_Model_Reduction),
> >>> even though they *should* be the same. Lansing pointed me to a jira ticket
> >>> that describes something similar, except it comes from an FMRC rather than
> >>> a GRIB feature collection:
> >>>
> >>> https://bugtracking.unidata.ucar.edu/browse/TDS-470
> >>>
> >>> I'm going to check a few other "best" collections to see if the same thing
> >>> is occurring elsewhere when the catalog is not partitioned by time.
> >>>
> >>> Sean
> >>>
> >>>> Hi Don,
> >>>>
> >>>> I'll take a look in the logs and see if any error messages are in there. 
> >>>>  I'll also float the runtime information feature.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Lansing
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi-
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The GFS 0.5 degree Best Time series on thredds.ucar.edu seems to have
> >>>>> some missing timesteps of bad indexes.  If you look at the IDV bundle:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/repository/entry/get/arglobe.xidv?entryid=26dc3204-a783-49b6-9466-fd5c78e03c47
> >>>>>
> >>>>> you'll see that the animation jumps around a bunch. This is a case where
> >>>>> it would be helpful to have the correct runtime information for each
> >>>>> timestep.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Don
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Don Murray
> >>>>> NOAA/ESRL/PSD and CIRES
> >>>>> 303-497-3596
> >>>>> http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/people/don.murray/
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Ticket Details
> >>> ===================
> >>> Ticket ID: KNL-571421
> >>> Department: Support THREDDS
> >>> Priority: Normal
> >>> Status: Open
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Don Murray
> >> NOAA/ESRL/PSD and CIRES
> >> 303-497-3596
> >> http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/people/don.murray/
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > Ticket Details
> > ===================
> > Ticket ID: KNL-571421
> > Department: Support THREDDS
> > Priority: Normal
> > Status: Open
> >
> 
> --
> Don Murray
> NOAA/ESRL/PSD and CIRES
> 303-497-3596
> http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/people/don.murray/
> 
> 


Ticket Details
===================
Ticket ID: KNL-571421
Department: Support THREDDS
Priority: Normal
Status: Open