[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[THREDDS #KNL-571421]: GFS Best Time Series not "best'

This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.

  • Subject: [THREDDS #KNL-571421]: GFS Best Time Series not "best'
  • Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 12:16:41 -0600
Hi Don,

We've tried recreating the index files, but that didn't fix the problem. This 
might take 
some time, as it does not affect all collections and it's not a simple index 
issue. John
is going to take a look at it to see what he can figure out, but for now we are 
not sure
what is going on.

Cheers!

Sean

> Any update on this?  It still seems to be screwed up.
> 
> Don
> 
> On 9/9/13 10:15 AM, Unidata THREDDS Support wrote:
> > Hi Don,
> >
> > I see the same thing. For example, if we compare the "best" for the GFS 1.0 
> > degree for
> >
> > 2013-09-08 18Z, 21Z
> >
> > with the 2013-09-08 run using
> >
> > 18Z (analysis), 21Z (3 hour forecast)
> >
> > the grids turn out to be different (I'm comparing MSLP_Eta_Model_Reduction),
> > even though they *should* be the same. Lansing pointed me to a jira ticket
> > that describes something similar, except it comes from an FMRC rather than
> > a GRIB feature collection:
> >
> > https://bugtracking.unidata.ucar.edu/browse/TDS-470
> >
> > I'm going to check a few other "best" collections to see if the same thing
> > is occurring elsewhere when the catalog is not partitioned by time.
> >
> > Sean
> >
> >> Hi Don,
> >>
> >> I'll take a look in the logs and see if any error messages are in there.  
> >> I'll also float the runtime information feature.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Lansing
> >>
> >>> Hi-
> >>>
> >>> The GFS 0.5 degree Best Time series on thredds.ucar.edu seems to have
> >>> some missing timesteps of bad indexes.  If you look at the IDV bundle:
> >>>
> >>> http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/repository/entry/get/arglobe.xidv?entryid=26dc3204-a783-49b6-9466-fd5c78e03c47
> >>>
> >>> you'll see that the animation jumps around a bunch. This is a case where
> >>> it would be helpful to have the correct runtime information for each
> >>> timestep.
> >>>
> >>> Don
> >>> --
> >>> Don Murray
> >>> NOAA/ESRL/PSD and CIRES
> >>> 303-497-3596
> >>> http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/people/don.murray/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> > Ticket Details
> > ===================
> > Ticket ID: KNL-571421
> > Department: Support THREDDS
> > Priority: Normal
> > Status: Open
> >
> 
> --
> Don Murray
> NOAA/ESRL/PSD and CIRES
> 303-497-3596
> http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/people/don.murray/
> 
> 


Ticket Details
===================
Ticket ID: KNL-571421
Department: Support THREDDS
Priority: Normal
Status: Open