This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
Hello, Would it be possible to get the `bob.nc` file you are working with, so that I might take a look and try to replicate this? I have tested this using different `.nc` files on my own MacOS system using `ncdump -f f` and `ncdump -f c`, but the output looks correct/as expected. If we were able to find a netCDF file that let us recreate this issue, I would be able to step into the debugger and try to figure out what is going on. Thank you, -Ward > hello support, > > i used "ncdump -f f bob.nc" to dump a netcdf file to show a colleague the > variable dimension order they should use from the fortran interface. > > to my surprise, the header info looks the same as without the -f flag and > the same as with "-f c". i'm not concerned about the data values, i'm > looking at 2d and 3d arrays and dimension orders in the variables section > of the header. > > i know which dimension in the array varies fastest and i expected to see > the reverse order listed in the fortran-version of the header dump. > > i'm running ncdump version 4.9.2 on a mac, if that matters. > > am i missing something here? > thanks, > nancy > > Ticket Details =================== Ticket ID: HAM-780236 Department: Support netCDF Priority: Normal Status: Closed =================== NOTE: All email exchanges with Unidata User Support are recorded in the Unidata inquiry tracking system and then made publicly available through the web. If you do not want to have your interactions made available in this way, you must let us know in each email you send to us.