[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[netCDFJava #QAX-163810]: Data Value Discrepancies Between Netcdf 4.2 and 4.3
- Subject: [netCDFJava #QAX-163810]: Data Value Discrepancies Between Netcdf 4.2 and 4.3
- Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 08:32:24 -0700
Very likely!
> John,
> I have found some projects that were utilizing a netcdf java 4.0 jar. Would
> that version be subject to the same behavior we are discussing? thanks,
>
> Sincerely
> Kevin
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ray, Kevin M
> Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 12:43 PM
> To: 'address@hidden'
> Subject: RE: [netCDFJava #QAX-163810]: Data Value Discrepancies Between
> Netcdf 4.2 and 4.3
>
> John,
> Here is a RUC file and associated gbx file for which data values were found
> to differ. Please let me know if you require anything else,
>
> Kevin
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Unidata netCDF Java Support [mailto:address@hidden]
> Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 12:41 PM
> To: Ray, Kevin M
> Cc: address@hidden
> Subject: [netCDFJava #QAX-163810]: Data Value Discrepancies Between Netcdf
> 4.2 and 4.3
>
> > John,
> > Thank you for getting back.
> >
> > I will take your advice and start the process of updating our netcdf-java
> > dependencies to version 4.3.
> >
> > In the meantime would you mind examining a specific file to hopefully
> > diagnose the nature of the discrepancies? I have been copying the file
> > using custom java code (adhering to the previously referenced tutorials)
> > and the netcdf tools UI jar (versions 4.2 and 4.3). My verification process
> > has been bringing the file's data into MATLAB using the freely available
> > nctoolbox. The data values brought into MATLAB were compared to the data
> > values parsed by the custom java code by dumping data values into a csv
> > file, and found to match in all instances. What did not match was the data
> > values between original files and those that had been copied using a 4.3
> > netcdf jar.
> >
> > I'm afraid that I do not have immediate access to an independent
> > verification process for the files under consideration, but I will look
> > around and try to see if there is one available. In the meantime what would
> > be the best way for me to get these files to you? Thanks!
>
> if too big for email, could use an ftp or web server or dropbox?
>
>
> Ticket Details
> ===================
> Ticket ID: QAX-163810
> Department: Support netCDF Java
> Priority: Normal
> Status: Open
>
>
Ticket Details
===================
Ticket ID: QAX-163810
Department: Support netCDF Java
Priority: Normal
Status: Open