[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[netCDF #SOA-856908]: NECDF file size
- Subject: [netCDF #SOA-856908]: NECDF file size
- Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 10:02:02 -0600
Hi Lin,
> I have a problem associated with netcdf file size. I already set supporting
> large file in environment variables,"setenv WRFIO_NCD_LARGE_FILE_SUPPORT 1".
> But, it still has problem when writing a file as large as 30G. So, is the
> netcdf do not permit to write a file to 30G?
NetCDF can support writing files larger than 30GB. For details, see this set of
questions and answers:
http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf/docs/faq.html#Large%20File%20Support
There have been a few bug fixes related to large files in previous versions of
netCDF software, described in the RELEASE_NOTES file that is included with each
new version, for example:
release notes for version 4.2.1-rc1:
http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf/release-notes-4.2.1-rc1.html
has this:
Fixed bug in 64-bit offset files with large records,
when last record variable requires more than 2**32
bytes per record.
[NCF-164]
with a link to more information about the fix in the "[NCF-164]" link:
https://www.unidata.ucar.edu/jira/browse/NCF-164
Other similar fixes in recent versions are described briefly and then in
more detail in these links:
Version 4.2.0:
http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf/release-notes-4.2.html
Fixed problem with 64-bit offset format where writing more
than 2**31 records resulted in erroneous NC_EINVALCOORDS error.
[NCF-101]
https://www.unidata.ucar.edu/jira/browse/NCF-101
Dimension size in classic model netCDF-4 files now allows
larger sizes than allowed for 64-bit offset classic files.
[NCF-117]
https://www.unidata.ucar.edu/jira/browse/NCF-117
Version 4.1.2:
Fixed two large-file bugs with using classic format or
64-bit offset format and accessing multidimensional
variables with more than 2**32 values.
(No detailed description available ...)
From the information you provided, I can't tell if any of the above bug fixes
are relevant to the problem you are seeing, but if you could provide a small
program that can be used to reproduce the problem, we can test it against the
current software release to see if it still occurs.
It may also be a problem with WRF configuration, but for that, you would have to
contact WRF support ...
--Russ
Russ Rew UCAR Unidata Program
address@hidden http://www.unidata.ucar.edu
Ticket Details
===================
Ticket ID: SOA-856908
Department: Support netCDF
Priority: Normal
Status: Closed