This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
Hi Ross, > I am working of generating NetCDF files from radar data (ray-based > volumes, ray-base and Cartesian products, cross-sections, etc.). > > For our ray-based data, it appears that the proposed CF/Radial format > would be ideal. As this is quite new, I can see that there is no > on-line compliance checker, and I haven't seen any evidence of groups > considering this format. > > Can you give me a sense of whether anybody in the radar/lidar community > is making a move to embrace this format yet? Yes, I think there is a growing community using it. There is also a mailing list on which you can ask about it: http://www.eol.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfradial-users > Also, if I produce files using CF/Radial, is there somebody who can work > with me to see if my files are compliant? I'm not sure what the compliance-checker plans are, but I'll bet someone on the cfradial-users mailing list knows. --Russ Russ Rew UCAR Unidata Program address@hidden http://www.unidata.ucar.edu Ticket Details =================== Ticket ID: LTA-465932 Department: Support netCDF Priority: High Status: Closed