This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
Hi Charlie, > The netCDF4 daily snapshots finally build on my development > machines again, and support all the interfaces I need. > This is good for many reasons, including that it allows me > to easily use DAP on Debian-based machines (Debian lacks Opendap > packages) via the DAP in libnetcdf mechanism. > > Two questions: > > 1. Is the prototype for chunksizep in nc_def_var_chunking() > unnecessarily weak? Could you use > > const size_t *chunksizep > > instead of > > size_t *chunksizep > > ? (can chunksizep contents change during call?) Yes, good catch! The call shouldn't change the values of the chunk sizes. > 2. What is (or will be) the syntax for indicating a netCDF4 > NC_STRING in CDL syntax? There's an example in the source file ncdump/tst_string_data.cdl. --Russ Russ Rew UCAR Unidata Program address@hidden http://www.unidata.ucar.edu Ticket Details =================== Ticket ID: KOM-880811 Department: Support netCDF Priority: Normal Status: Closed