This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
I wrote: > ... the fix will be in the snapshot release created tonight. Oops, we discovered the fix involves more thought, so we may not get this fixed until after the upcoming AMS meeting (Jan 20 to 25). However, it appears that using the C order for chunk sizes in the F90 call to nf90_def_var_chunking is an adequate workaround, until we get a well-tested fix checked in. So the advice I gave in the previous response is OK, and you'll have to continue using it until the bug you identified is fixed, which won't be by tonight. Please let us know, if you get a chance, whether reversing the chunksizes made things work. Thanks! --Russ Russ Rew UCAR Unidata Program address@hidden http://www.unidata.ucar.edu Ticket Details =================== Ticket ID: NNS-961385 Department: Support netCDF Priority: Normal Status: Closed