[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[netCDF #RND-134504]: Support for fortran compiler flags in netcdf

This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.

  • Subject: [netCDF #RND-134504]: Support for fortran compiler flags in netcdf
  • Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 08:28:09 -0600
> Dear Sir,
> 
> I'm writing to this email address because it was given in your
> website.  However, I don't know whether writing to this address is
> correct, so I apologise for any inconvenience.
> 
> My report is about building netcdf in 64bit mode with a couple of
> flags.  This seems to be troublesome, a lot of environment variables
> must be set before launching configure, not all of them being obvious:
> 
> For Fortran, there're F90FLAGS, FFLAGS, FCFLAGS, and FCFLAGS_f90 Some
> of them are recognised by configure, but are not passed to to the final
> Makefile. It seems that F90FLAGS/FFLAGS is ignored, still a message is
> printed out by configure that confirms the detection of these
> variables.
> 
> I think that this is very confusing.  On Solaris, it might be helpful
> to tell the user to pass -fast to the compiler before any other 64bit
> options like -xarch=v9.  Otherwise (at least with studio11) the
> compiler will still generate 32 bit code which leads to interesting
> error messages during the compilation.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Burkhard Neinhues
> 
> --
> Dr. Burkhard Neinhues
> Aerodynamics Domain, Building 65A
> Tools and Simulations, EGAMG
> AIRBUS Deutschland GmbH
> D-28183 Bremen, Germany
> 
> Phone: +49 421 538 7421
> FAX:   +49 421 538 871 7421
> mailto:address@hidden
> 
> 
> This e-mail is intended only for the above addressee. It may contain
> privileged information.  If you are not the addressee you must not
> copy, distribute, disclose or use any of the information in it.  If you
> have received it in error please delete it and immediately notify the
> sender.
> 
> Security Notice: all e-mail, sent to or from this address, may be
> accessed by someone other than the recipient, for system management and
> security reasons. This access is controlled under Regulation of
> security reasons.  This access is controlled under Regulation of
> Investigatory Powers Act 2000, Lawful Business Practises.
> 

Thanks for pointing this out. I will look into this and get back to you...

Thanks!

Ed

Ticket Details
===================
Ticket ID: RND-134504
Department: Support netCDF
Priority: Normal
Status: Open