Re: Need more source code

Hi Carl, i was about to send a note saying that that particular class should be 
ignored. Id be interested in finding out if you have any trouble using the ant 
build.



Carl Drews wrote:
> John -
>
> I'm going to cancel this request.  Hank and I figured out how to
> eliminate the non-compiling code in Eclipse, and our application can be
> built and run without those portions of the source code tree.
>
> On a related note, someday we want to invite you and Robb down the
> street for a design review of the code we are busily writing.  We are
> figuring out how to do things, but we might not be doing them in the
> most optimal way.  And you guys are the experts.  We'll let you know.
>
> Carl
>
> Carl Drews wrote:
>
>
> > John -
> >
> > I have been instructed to investigate the grib1 problem (with negative
> > array indexes) at the source code level.  So I took the source code that
> > you and Robb had sent me, and placed it into my source code tree.  I
> > intended to remove the corresponding jars from Eclipse, so that I would
> > create the code from my compiler instead of from the jar distribution.
> >
> > I get a lot of errors when I try to build the tree.  Here is the first one:
> >
> > class N3ver1 implements ucar.nc2.IOServiceProvider {
> >
> > private ucar.nc2.NetcdfFile ncfile;
> > private ucar.netcdf.NetcdfFile netcdf;   <--- ucar.netcdf cannot be
> > resolved to a type
> >
> > Sure enough, I don't have that portion of the source code.  Can you send
> > me the ucar.netcdf portion of the source code tree, or tell me where to
> > download it?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Carl