This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
>To: address@hidden >From: Rich Signell <address@hidden> >Subject: ncdigest has problems with some types of mail? >Organization: USGS >Keywords: 200411241239.iAOCdJ7j014067 ncdigest Hi Rich, > I was disappointed to receive my ncdigest today > and find that the reply that I posted yesterday > from my Lotus Notes web-mail account apparently > did not get interpreted correctly by ncdigest. > > The 3rd posting in ncdigest #824 looks like > > > "Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 18:58:45 -0500 > From: "Richard P Signell" <address@hidden> > Subject: Re: How to save a ZIP file within a NetCDF file > > PEZPTlQgZmFjZT0iRGVmYXVsdCBTYW5zIFNlcmlmLCBWZXJkYW5hLCBBcmlhbCwgSGVsdmV0aWNh > LCBzYW5zLXNlcmlmIiBzaXplPTI+PERJVj5FZCw8L0RJVj48RElWPiZuYnNwOzwvRElWPjxESVY+ > VGhlIGNvZGUgaGFzaCBpZGVhIHNvdW5kcyB1c2VmdWwgZm9yIGh1Z2UmbmJzcDtjb2Rlcy4mbmJz--" > > > > thus taking much of the punch out of my snappy > reply! > > I know that the "undigested" version came through > ok. I'm very sorry about this. We're looking into what happened, since this has never occurred before. We would like to make sure it doesn't happen again. When we determine what happened, I'll re-post your original undigested version to the ncdigest mailing list with a brief explanation that this was our fault, so readers can see your response in context. --Russ