[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 20041130: NetCDF 3.6.0 Bugs
- Subject: Re: 20041130: NetCDF 3.6.0 Bugs
- Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 08:36:17 -0700
>To: address@hidden
>From: "Kevin W. Thomas" <address@hidden>
>Subject: NetCDF 3.6.0 Bugs
>Organization: OU
>Keywords: 200412010015.iB10F6lI010328 netCDF 3.6.0
Hi Kevin,
> I have a couple of netCDF 3.6.0_beta6 bugs to report.
>
> (1) Scenerio...
>
> I'm trying to run WRFSI 2.0.1 on an SGI with 64-bit binaries. My goal
> is to process a huge grid. The problem is that I start getting a lot
> of netCDF errors due to functions returning NC_EVARSIZE, even though
> I modified the code to call "NF_OPEN" correctly.
To create a netCDF file with 64-bit offsets, you must explicitly call
NF_CREATE with the 64-bit offset flag. There's no way to get that
flag set correctly by just calling NF_OPEN (and there shouldn't be,
since then the file might have both 32-bit offsets and 64-bit
offsets).
Are you calling NF_CREATE rather than NF_OPEN with something like:
iret = nf_create('foo.nc',
OR(NF_NOCLOBBER,NF_64BIT_OFFSET),
ncid)
> I've isolated the problem to a "NF_ENDDEF" call. The call eventually
> ends up in "NC_begins". ncp->flags is zero, so "sizeof_off_t" is always
> set to 4. The problem is that earlier on when the "ncp" pointer is
> first set, the value of "flags" is never set.
>
> My workaround is to hardwire "sizeof_off_t" to 8 in "NC_begins", as I
> require this option.
If this is still a problem even after the correct NF_CREATE call, we'd
like to be able to duplicate the problem here and fix it. In that
case, could you at least send us a CDL of the file you are trying to
create and any other details we would need to duplicate tthe problem?
Thanks!
--Russ