[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
20030430: Linux netCDF build
- Subject: 20030430: Linux netCDF build
- Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 13:02:28 -0600
David,
> To: address@hidden
> From: "David C. Wong" <address@hidden>
> Subject: help please
> Organization: SAIC (Contractor to the US EPA)
The above message contained the following:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to install netcdf3.4 on a Linux box:
>
> [dell@frontend-0 ncdump]$ uname -a
> Linux frontend-0 2.4.18-19.7.xsmp #1 SMP Thu Dec 12 07:56:58 EST 2002
> i686 unknown
>
> I have followed the instructions stated in the using ifc compiler notes.
> I checked make.log and there is no Error message. But when I tried to
> use the ncdump, I got this:
>
> ncdump /home/dell/bench/cctm/input/CCTM_b1aCONC.071000
> ncdump: /home/dell/bench/cctm/input/CCTM_b1aCONC.071000: Invalid
> dimension id or name
>
> In addition, when I do a make test, I got FAILUREs. Here are some of the
> messages:
>
> Could someone tell me what is wrong? Thanks.
We've successfully built and tested the netCDF package on our Linux
2.4.18-14smp system, so you should be able to do the same.
I'll need more information, however, in order to diagnose the problem.
Would you please send me items B through H, which are described near the
end of the file INSTALL.html.
> Best regards,
> David Wong
>
> *** Testing nc_get_var_short ...
> FAILURE at line 973 of test_get.c: value read not that expected
> FAILURE at line 973 of test_get.c: value read not that expected
> FAILURE at line 973 of test_get.c: value read not that expected
> FAILURE at line 973 of test_get.c: value read not that expected
> FAILURE at line 973 of test_get.c: value read not that expected
> FAILURE at line 973 of test_get.c: value read not that expected
> FAILURE at line 973 of test_get.c: value read not that expected
> FAILURE at line 973 of test_get.c: value read not that expected
> 490 good comparisons.
> ### 192 FAILURES TESTING nc_get_var_short! ###
> *** Testing nc_get_var_int ...
> FAILURE at line 1063 of test_get.c: value read not that expected
>
> FAILURE at line 1063 of test_get.c: value read not that expected
>
> FAILURE at line 1063 of test_get.c: value read not that expected
>
> FAILURE at line 1063 of test_get.c: value read not that expected
>
> FAILURE at line 1063 of test_get.c: value read not that expected
>
> FAILURE at line 1063 of test_get.c: value read not that expected
>
> FAILURE at line 1063 of test_get.c: value read not that expected
>
> FAILURE at line 1063 of test_get.c: value read not that expected
>
> *** Testing nc_get_var_long ...
> FAILURE at line 1153 of test_get.c: value read not that expected
>
> FAILURE at line 1153 of test_get.c: value read not that expected
>
> FAILURE at line 1153 of test_get.c: value read not that expected
>
> FAILURE at line 1153 of test_get.c: value read not that expected
>
> FAILURE at line 1153 of test_get.c: value read not that expected
>
> FAILURE at line 1153 of test_get.c: value read not that expected
>
> FAILURE at line 1153 of test_get.c: value read not that expected
>
> FAILURE at line 1153 of test_get.c: value read not that expected
>
> 903 good comparisons.
> ### 286 FAILURES TESTING nc_get_var_long! ###
> *** Testing nc_get_var_float ... 1194 good comparisons. ok
> *** Testing nc_get_var_double ... 1207 good comparisons. ok
> *** Testing nc_get_var1_text ... 179 good comparisons. ok
> *** Testing nc_get_var1_uchar ... 264 good comparisons. ok
> *** Testing nc_get_var1_schar ... 269 good comparisons. ok
> *** Testing nc_get_var1_short ...
> FAILURE at line 297 of test_get.c: expected: -5, got: -1025
> FAILURE at line 297 of test_get.c: expected: -32768, got: 128
> FAILURE at line 297 of test_get.c: expected: 32767, got: -129
> FAILURE at line 297 of test_get.c: expected: -32768, got: 128
> FAILURE at line 297 of test_get.c: expected: -32768, got: 128
> FAILURE at line 297 of test_get.c: expected: 32767, got: -129
> FAILURE at line 297 of test_get.c: expected: -32768, got: 128
> FAILURE at line 297 of test_get.c: expected: 32767, got: -129
>
>
> --
> David C. Wong Ph.D.
> Sr. Sci. Application Consultant
> [Image] [Image]
> Environmental Protection Agency "I took the road less traveled and
> ATTN: David Wong that has made all the difference."
> Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Robert Frost
> Phone: 919-541-3400
> Fax: 919-541-0056
Regards,
Steve Emmerson