[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
20020425: bug report (+fix) for netcdf f90 library
- Subject: 20020425: bug report (+fix) for netcdf f90 library
- Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 11:14:39 -0600
Rolf,
>Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 09:03:27 +0200 (MET DST)
>From: Rolf Sander <address@hidden>
>Organization: Max-Planck Institute of Chemistry
>To: Steve Emmerson <address@hidden>
>Subject: Re: 20020425: bug report (+fix) for netcdf f90 library
>Keywords: 200204251416.g3PEGpa11170
The above message contained the following:
> > Our Fortran-90 expert says, however, that the line in question is OK
> > because the right-hand-side is automatically reduced to the size of
> > the left-hand-side. We suspect, therefore, that your Fortran-90
> > compiler doesn't conform to the standard.
>
> I wasn't quite sure about this myself so I looked it up. In the Compaq
> Fortran Language Reference Manual at
> http://www.cecalc.ula.ve/documentacion/tutoriales/CF95AU54/lrm0077.htm I
> found:
>
> "Array assignment is permitted when the array expression on the right
> has the same shape as the array variable on the left, or the expression
> on the right is a scalar."
>
> For the Lahey compiler, diferent lengths are only allowed for CHARACTER
> type.
I looked it up in our ISO Fortran-90 Standard. The main thing I found
was the following regarding the assignment statement definition
ASSIGNMENT-STMT is VARIABLE = EXPR
7.5.1.4 Intrisic assignment conformance rules
For an intrinsic assignment statement, VARIABLE must conform in
shape, and if EXPR is an array, VARIABLE must also be an array. ...
So, I think you might be right.
> I think the effect you usually get is pretty much what you described:
> The variable will be assigned the reduced part of the big array.
> However, I fear that with range-check options switched off, the rest of
> the big array will be poked uncontrolled into some other part of the
> memory next to the small array. This may or may not confuse your program
> depending on what used to be stored there.
>
> Anyway, I think with the changed code we're on the safe side.
>
> Greetings
> Rolf
>
> ps: Thanks for providing the netcdf interface. It's a big help for
> storing my model output!
Our pleasure. Thanks for the feedback.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> A new journal, a new concept: www.atmos-chem-phys.org
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Rolf Sander phone: [+49] 6131/305-449
> Air Chemistry Department fax: [+49] 6131/305-436
> Max-Planck Institute of Chemistry email: address@hidden
> PO Box 3060, 55020 Mainz, Germany www.mpch-mainz.mpg.de/~sander/
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Regards,
Steve Emmerson <http://www.unidata.ucar.edu>