This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
>To: address@hidden >From: Chad Fox <address@hidden> >Subject: netCDF version 4 >Organization: Raytheon - Denver Operations >Keywords: 200105102228.f4AMSKp16069 Hi Chad, > Hello, my name is Chad Fox and I work for Raytheon in Denver. I am > currently working on the National Polar-Orbiting Envioronmental > Satellite System (NPOESS) ground system. We are currently evaluating > different data formats, one of wich is netCDF. I used netCDF in the > past in my graduate work at the University of Colorado, so I am somewhat > familar with its capabilities. I have several concerns about some of > the limitations that were pointed out in 'UNIDATA's netCDF Interface for > Data Access: Status and Plans'. The paper states that may of these > limitations will be addressed and taken care of in version 4. When do > you expect to release version 4? I know that HDF has released their > version 5, which eliminated the 2 gig limitation on file size. Also, do > you have any plans for netCDF to become Joint Technical Architecture > (JTA) compliant in the furture? I would appreciate any information that > you can give me. Thank you for your time. We applied for resources to develop netCDF 4 last year: http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/packages/netcdf/itr/ but the proposal was rejected and we still haven't located resources to accomplish this work. Strictly speaking, the size of netCDF files is not limited to 2 Gbytes, so whether you can use it for larger datasets depends on the structure of the data. The details are spelled out in this email reply to a support question about size limitations: http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/glimpse/netcdf/4169 As for JTA compliance, this question came up a couple of months ago, and the answer I wrote then still applies: http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/glimpse/netcdf/4140 --Russ