Re: 20000328: reason for NC_MAX_VAR ?

Sven,

> From: Sven Siggelkow <address@hidden>
> Subject: reason for NC_MAX_VAR ?
> Organization: Uni Freiburg
> Keywords: 200003280848.BAA26777 netCDF NC_MAX_VAR

In the above message, you wrote:

> is there a reason why to limit NC_MAX_VAR and NC_MAX_ATTR? It would be
> more convenient to leave the number of items open (in fact I set them to
> 100000, it seems without problems), as I typically need more than 2000
> items.
> 
> Best regards
> Sven Siggelkow
> -- 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Dipl.-Ing. Sven Siggelkow                  Phone: +49-(0)761-203-8215
> Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg        Secr.: +49-(0)761-203-8260
> Computer Science Department                  Fax: +49-(0)761-203-8262
> Georges-Köhler-Allee 52
> 79110 Freiburg            mailto:address@hidden
> Germany        http://lmb.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/people/siggelkow
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------

Please see <http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/cgi-bin/mfs/70/2051?65#mfs>
and <http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/glimpse/netcdf/3093>.

Regards,
Steve Emmerson   <http://www.unidata.ucar.edu>