[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 20000321: netcdf installation problems: o32 vs. n32

This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.

  • Subject: Re: 20000321: netcdf installation problems: o32 vs. n32
  • Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 08:30:11 -0700
Pawel,

>Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 13:14:55 +0100
>From: Pawel Schlichtholz <address@hidden>
>To: Steve Emmerson <address@hidden>
>Subject: Re: 20000321: netcdf installation problems: o32 vs. n32
>Keywords: 200003210910.CAA24540

In the above message, you wrote:

> Dear Steve, 
> Thank a lot for your help,
> 
> The installation works with -n32 option  (-o32 did not help):
> 
> I used
> setenv CC /bin/c89
> setenv CPPFLAGS "-DNDEBUG"
> setenv CFLAGS "-O -n32 -OPT:Olimit=2199"
> setenv FC /bin/f90
> setenv FFLAGS "-O -n32 -OPT:Olimit=2199"
> setenv CXX /bin/CC
> setenv CXXFLAGS "-O -n32 -OPT:Olimit=2199"
> 
> The option  -OPT:Olimit=2199 was suggested by make test (I put it
> for all compilers)

Great!

Regards,
Steve Emmerson   <http://www.unidata.ucar.edu>