This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
Subject: 1995621 NetCDF errors w/Solaris & NSF >To: address@hidden >From: "David Borg-Breen (2052/x6816)" <address@hidden> >Organization: . >Keywords: 199506211734.AA22044 Dave, > The following patches were installed on our SparcServer 1000 > running Solaris 2.4 in addition to the default patches from > the Solaris 2.4 cdrom: > > 101878-09.tar OpenWindows 3.4: Xview jumbo patch. > 101945-23.tar SunOS 5.4: jumbo patch for kernel > (newer rev than on CD) > 101959-03.tar SunOS 5.4: lp jumbo patch > 102002-03.tar SunOS 5.4: fixes to esp driver > (SCSI bus bug) > 102070-01.tar SunOS 5.4: Bugfix for rpcbind/portmapper > 102169-01.tar SunOS 5.4: ufs_putapage: bn==UFS_HOLE > (system panic when filesystems fils up). > 102216-01.tar SunOS 5.4: NFS client starts using unreserved UDP > 102319-01.tar SunOS 5.4: sendmail POINT PATCH > > The system administrator for the SparcServer 1000 described the problem > to Sun in hopes they could recommend another patch or other solution, > but Sun drew a blank. > > Can you check with your system administrator to see if there is another > patch he recommends? We have the following possibly relevant patches installed; 101242-10 libC 4.0.1 (C++): Shared library Jumbo patch 101907-05 SunOS 5.4: Jumbo patch to volume management 101925-02 SunOS 5.4: header file fixes 101945-27 SunOS 5.4: jumbo patch for kernel 102007-01 SunOS 5.4: vnode v_count is not maintained correctly 102020-07 SunOS 5.4: asynchronous I/O and sd fixes 102070-01 SunOS 5.4: Bugfix for rpcbind/portmapper 102216-01 SunOS 5.4: NFS client starts using unreserved UDP port numbers Do you have this problem on local disk (non-nfs)? Also, do you have other platform(s) on which you can run this same test? mike