[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 950321: Solaris, nctest and C++, bleah
- Subject: Re: 950321: Solaris, nctest and C++, bleah
- Date: Tue, 21 Mar 1995 16:32:24 -0700
>Keywords: 199503211819.AA28912
Hi Paul,
> I am a bonehead. I wiped out and started over and....
> amazingly, everything seem to work.
>
> Things must have gotten scewed (by my own boneheadedness) in my old
> distribution.
No problem, I'm glad it worked this time.
> I have another question, this one is short though (don't bother
> answering it if this is something I should post to the group.).
>
> I am looking for a "generic" applications that will:
> - read a generic netCDF file
> - allow the user to get a list of the different variables
> - do plotting of some variable vs. another variable
> - do simple statistical analysis, mean, stddev., etc
>
> I've been looking at the "NetCDF Operators and Utilities" (ncprogs.ps)
> document and some of the software available free in "utilities.txt"
> (also on Mosaic I see).
I'd stick with what's in the utilities document, and view the WWW form:
http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/packages/netcdf/utilities.html
as it's got lot's more information if you follow the links and you can even
see what the output of some of the packages look like that way. The
`ncopers' document is getting old and we haven't had the resources to do
much development, while others have produced some very useful packages in
the absence of ncopers.
> A lot of these packages go overboard. I want something like simplistic
> like "ncview" that can do simple plotting and statistics on vectors,
> or matricies of data where user can just point and click.
>
> Any off the top of your head?
>
> I'm continuing my investigation of those in "utilities.txt"
I like the IDL package ncbrowse, but it requires that you already have IDL.
Others have spoken highly of the ACE/gr package, but I haven't used it yet.
Actually, I haven't used many of the packages that are described in the
utilities document, so if you decide to compare a few, I'd be interested in
your conclusions.
I maintain the utilities document and add new packages whenever I come
across them, but that doesn't mean there aren't more I'm not aware of.
Recently I've got wind of a couple more packages, but I haven't had time to
contact the authors yet to see what information is available. When I do,
I'll add an entry in the "What's New" page.
--Russ