[LDM #ICF-841424]: FreeBSD 10.3 patches for ldm-6.13.4

Eric,

> The only issue left. it that the __BSD_VISIBLE define
> must be either 0 or 1 as the headers use the #if __BSD_VISIBLE
> rather than an #if defined construct.

The assertion that the C macro __BSD_VISIBLE must be either 0 or 1 seems
inconsistent with the patches you sent, which added lines like this to the
file "noaaport/shmfifo.hin", for example:

    +#if ! ( _NO_XOPEN4 && _NO_XOPEN5 ) && !defined(_DARWIN_C_SOURCE) && 
!defined(__BSD_VISIBLE)

Note the use of "!defined(__BSD_VISIBLE)".

Please respond to this apparent inconsistency.

Regards,
Steve Emmerson

Ticket Details
===================
Ticket ID: ICF-841424
Department: Support LDM
Priority: Urgent
Status: Closed
===================
NOTE: All email exchanges with Unidata User Support are recorded in the Unidata 
inquiry tracking system and then made publicly available through the web.  If 
you do not want to have your interactions made available in this way, you must 
let us know in each email you send to us.