This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
Hi Paul, This email is designed to try and catch you up on a variety of things that have been happening over the past couple of days... On 20130301.1519 MST Steve asked: > Did you receive data during the rtstats(1) outages? On: 20130301.1522 MST you replied: > It appears we did today. Other days we struggled. Today things were > good as far as I can tell. Satellite, nexrad3 and surface data all > flowed without a problem. I just logged onto climate.cod.edu as 'mcidas' so I could see if you had a continuous data record of decoded surface observations in McIDAS format. SFCLISTs of surface stations over the past 48 hours show that you have been receiving and decoding data into McIDAS surface MD files each hour (I checked reports for KDEN, KBOS and KLAX only). This implies that the real-time stats outages being seen in the IDS|DDPLUS volume or products plots for climate.cod.edu were either artifacts associated with real-time stats displays, or hiccups in reporting of real-time stats on climate. I am feeling more and more confident that the real-time stats data gaps seen in the climate.cod.edu record were artifacts caused by some as yet unknown cause on our machine that is producing the plots. I say this because all rtstats records stopped updating last night (I happened to notice exactly when it happened since I was working on a problem when it happened). The situation was not resolved until this morning when our system administrator, Mike Schmidt, rebooted our machine that products the real-time stats plots. Also: Because we got very concerned that the version of LDM-6.11.x that was running on your NOAAPort ingest machine, noaaport.cod.edu, may have somehow been causing some of the problems you were reporting, I took the liberty of installing LDM-6.10.1 on noaaport.cod.edu and switching to its use. Because your decoded record of surface observations in McIDAS appears to be complete (see above), I am left with the feeling that dropping back from LDM-6.11.3 to LDM-6.10.1 may not have been called for on noaaport.cod.edu (or climate.cod.edu where I also reverted the LDM release being used). I want to leave things running as they are now at COD (meaning running LDM-6.10.1 on both noaaport.cod.edu and climate.cod.edu). We will be reviewing the sequence of events that transpired over the past couple of days on your machines before making the decision of whether or not to go back to using LDM-6.11.x on your machines. I hope you are OK with this! A couple of questions for you: - is there any "packet shaping" (deep packet inspection and/or artificially-imposed bandwidth limiting) being done either in your department or in COD at the moment? - are you aware of any maintenance having recently been done on routers at COD that would be in the path of data flowing into our out of whatever machines you are using for LDM ingest or relay? We are trying to trace down the cause of some very strange events related to LDM use recently, and our experience working with network folks at LSU (where one of the problems was experienced) makes us suspicious that the problems seen could have been caused by "packet shaping" software or router mis-configurations. re: > Could we have been backed up via an IDD? The REQUEST lines I see on climate.cod.edu show that you are REQUESTing NOAAPort-originated data (i.e., IDS|DDPLUS, HDS, NIMAGE, NGRID, and NOTHER) only from internal COD machines: request NIMAGE .* 10.21.48.16 == noaaport.cod.edu request NIMAGE .* 10.21.48.17 == noaaportold.cod.edu request NGRID .* 10.21.48.16 request NGRID .* 10.21.48.17 request NOTHER .* 10.21.48.16 request NOTHER .* 10.21.48.17 request NGRAPH .* 10.21.48.16 request NGRAPH .* 10.21.48.17 request IDS|DDPLUS|HDS .* 10.21.48.16 request IDS|DDPLUS|HDS .* 10.21.48.17 The only possible exception to this is your set of REQUESTS for NEXRAD Level III data: request NNEXRAD "SDUS(2|3|5|7|8)[1-6] (K*)" 10.21.48.16 request NNEXRAD "SDUS(2|3|5|7|8)[1-6] (K*)" 10.21.48.17 request NNEXRAD "SDUS(2|3|5|7|8)[1-6] (K*)" weather.cod.edu Given this, the answer to your question about being backed up via an IDD would be no (unless weather.cod.edu is REQUESTing NEXRAD3 (ake NNEXRAD) from an external machine. Cheers, Tom -- **************************************************************************** Unidata User Support UCAR Unidata Program (303) 497-8642 P.O. Box 3000 address@hidden Boulder, CO 80307 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unidata HomePage http://www.unidata.ucar.edu **************************************************************************** Ticket Details =================== Ticket ID: BHX-452315 Department: Support NOAAPORT Priority: Normal Status: Closed