[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[LDM #VDS-923265]: LDM upgrade

This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.

  • Subject: [LDM #VDS-923265]: LDM upgrade
  • Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 13:23:15 -0600
Hi Eric,

re:
> I am in the process of upgrading an LDM installation.  Everything
> seems to have gone OK, minus the ldm product queue.  We are moving
> from a Solaris system to a Fedora system.
> 
> uname -a is:
> 
> Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.15-1.2054_FC5 #1 Tue Mar 14 15:48:33
> EST 2006 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux

We are running the LDM on three different installations of Fedora Core
5: one is very much like yours, a 32-bit installation; and the other
two are both 64-bit installations on dual processor machines.  We have
not experienced any undue errors on any of these machines.

> I have tried recreating the product queue (ldmadmin delqueue &&
> ldmadmin mkqueue) and also tried:
> 
> bash-3.1$ ./pqcreate -v -f -s 400000 -q /usr/local/ldm/data/ldm.pq

I assume that you did not receive any error messages when either
'ldmadmin mkqueue' or 'pqcreate' were run.  If you did see errors, please
pass them along.

> however, I still get
> 
> ldmadmin start
> The product-queue is corrupt.  Use
> ldmadmin delqueue && ldmadmin mkqueue
> to remove and recreate it.
> Jun 28 15:39:36 UTC localhost.localdomain : LDM not started

Some questions:

- what size queue are you trying to create

- what is the output you get when running the following commands:

  <as 'ldm'>
  cd ~ldm

  id ldm

  ls -alt data
  ls -alt data/ldm.pq

  pqcat -l- -s -q data/ldm.pq

- do you have enough room in the partition where the LDM queue is located

> I have recompiled without any issues twice now.

Are you specifying any flags to 'configure' when you run it?  Are you
running 'make distclean' between compilation attempts?

> I'm thinking I'm just
> missing something really obvious, that a second set of eyes might be
> able to find.

I agree.  We need some more information to sort this out.

> Thanks for the help,

No worries.

Cheers,

Tom
****************************************************************************
Unidata User Support                                    UCAR Unidata Program
(303) 497-8642                                                 P.O. Box 3000
address@hidden                                   Boulder, CO 80307
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unidata HomePage                       http://www.unidata.ucar.edu
****************************************************************************


Ticket Details
===================
Ticket ID: VDS-923265
Department: Support LDM
Priority: Normal
Status: Closed