[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[IDV #NBS-792550]: IDV 4.1: Crash: Data Transect View
- Subject: [IDV #NBS-792550]: IDV 4.1: Crash: Data Transect View
- Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 10:38:34 -0700
> On Nov 25, 2013, at 9:56 AM, Unidata IDV Support <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > SSEC and Unidata recently fixed a bug relating to this behavior originally
> > pointed out by Marty Baxter at the last Unidata User committee meeting.
> > Please try the nightly build to see if this resolves the issue.
> > http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/downloads/idv/nightly/index.jsp
> >
> > Please keep us up-to-date on your progress.
>
> IDV Support,
>
> I installed IDV 4.1u1 (nightly build) and the crash went away.
Dave,
It used to be a bug in the data transect view control, but fixed in the
nightly.
>
> I have a feeling, though, that I’m not understanding what the data transect
> view is able, and not able, to do. I want to be able to plot multiple
> quantities (superimposed) on a single vertical cross section, which I would
> like to drag the transect around at will and have all of the superposed plots
> automatically follow along. I am now able to create a number of data
> transects, but each vertical cross section that I tried to plot onto a
> previously created one ended up with its own transect. Am I missing
> something, or this is a limitation of the IDV right now?
I think this is the design that each cross section has its own transect.
Yuan
>
> — Dave
>
> >
> >> IDV support,
> >>
> >> I am using IDV 4.1 on a MacBook Pro running Mac OS X v.10.9 (Mavericks).
> >>
> >> I am trying to set up a data transect view in which I can plot vertical
> >> cross sections of multiple fields, read from a NetCDF file created by the
> >> WRF-ARW model.
> >>
> >> I am following instructions provided (by Yuan) in an email exchange in the
> >> Unidata IDV mail archives (May 21,
> >> 2011<http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/support/help/MailArchives/idv/msg04564.html>):
> >>
> >>>>>> The answer to your question is yes, the IDV can plot a 2D ...
> >>
> >>>>>> When you want to put
> >>>>>> multiple field in the same cross section, you need to bring up the
> >>>>>> transect view window, File> New> View Window> Misc> Transect
> >>>>>> and
> >>>>>> Map, and it will be good to close the original map view window to
> >>>>>> avoid the confusion.
> >>
> >> I did the above (both before and after loading the data set, in separate
> >> attempts with the same result). So far, so good.
> >>
> >>>>>> To display the 2D cross section of terrain, select the Transect View
> >>>>>> on the
> >>>>>> left by clicking in the window, and select the terrain data source in
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>> Field Selector and create a Data Transect display.
> >>
> >> I did this, too. (The 2-D terrain data field in my data set is called
> >> “Terrain Height”.)
> >>
> >> However, as soon as I click on the “Create Display” button, the IDV
> >> crashes catastrophically with no cries of distress. The following message
> >> appears in the system log, and that’s it:
> >>
> >> "Nov 24 23:53:32 [my machine name] com.apple.launchd.peruser.101[157]
> >> (ucar.unidata.idv.90496[10248]) <Error>: Exited with code: 1”
> >>
> >> I get the same result when I try to plot a vertical cross-section of a 3-D
> >> field (potential temperature). (For that field, “Data Transect” isn’t one
> >> of the plot type options offered, so I selected “Vertical Cross Section >
> >> Color filled contour cross section” and "Level > All levels”.)
> >>
> >> The email from Yuan goes on to say:
> >>
> >>>>>> In the transect
> >>
> >>>>>> display, you can add multiple fields. To reproduce the C image, you
> >>>>>> first
> >>
> >>>>>> create a cross section display of certain variable, and then create the
> >>>>>> Data Transect display of terrain.
> >>
> >> Could I simply be creating my vertical cross sections in the wrong order?
> >> That is, instead of opening a data transect window first, should I create
> >> a vertical cross section plot (of potential temperature, say), then open a
> >> data transect window (which presumably senses the preexisting vertical
> >> cross section) and plot terrain heights onto it (presumably superimposing
> >> the terrain height cross section onto the potential temperature cross
> >> section)?
> >>
> >> If so, this seems pretty sensitive. (I’d try it out, but we just had a
> >> power outage and I lost my internet connection. Bed time!)
> >>
> >> The data source I’m using is available as a catalog via:
> >> http://virga.sfsu.edu:8080/repository/thredds > WRF Model Output >
> >> wrfout_2013-11-20_00_GFS_EastBay.nc
> >>
> >> or via HTTP at:
> >> http://virga.sfsu.edu/data/wrf/wrfout_2013-11-20_00_GFS_EastBay.nc
> >>
> >> — Dave
> >>
> >> ****************************************************************
> >> * | __ __ \|/ *
> >> * Dr. Dave Dempsey | ) ^ /|| ||\ --0-- *
> >> * Dept. of Earth & Climate Sciences |) ) ^ / ||_|| \ /|\ *
> >> * San Francisco State University | ) ) / | _ | \ *
> >> * 1600 Holloway Ave. |) )/ || || \ *
> >> * San Francisco, CA 94132 | ) ) ||_|| \ *
> >> * |) ) ) | _ | \ *
> >> * Phone: (415) 338-7716 | ) ) || || \ *
> >> * FAX: (415) 338-7705 |) ) )~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~*
> >> * Email: address@hidden<mailto:address@hidden> | ) ) ) ~
> >> ~ ~ ~ *
> >> * |) ) ) ) ~ ~ ~ *
> >> ****************************************************************
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > Ticket Details
> > ===================
> > Ticket ID: NBS-792550
> > Department: Support IDV
> > Priority: Normal
> > Status: Closed
> >
> >
>
>
>
Ticket Details
===================
Ticket ID: NBS-792550
Department: Support IDV
Priority: High
Status: Closed