This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
> Rebonjour - > > With Don's support I have been able to get a new build and have now > tested the wind barbs. > > Using full spatial resolution the barbs scale now much better, though I > have to go down to a factor of 1 for a typical wind wind field. So, > there is now lee way to make them even smaller. I would suggest that you > blow down the vector by a factor of 2 to 4, 3 say. In the test I ware running, I had the same feeling. But, this will change the expect behavior of existing bundles and this is not what we like to see. > > For data thinning the "Skip XY" still does not work. It issues "sample > do not form a valid grid". The RUC grid file I was testing on, the "skip xy" was working ok, maybe you can upload a sample file of yours. > > Thus, the only method to spatially thin the data set is thorugh the > stride tab. However, when thinning this way IDV falls back to the giant > vectors we have had before. > I can not reproduce this. The stride and skip sent back the same result. Yuan > All said I hope we are almost there, HP > > On 2011-02-03 04:03, Unidata IDV Support wrote: > > Bonjour HansPeter, > > > > Please checkout the nightly build version of the IDV (the nightly builds > > happen at ~8UTC). Let us know if the wind barbs behave as you expect. > > > > Thanks for your input. > > > > -Julien > > > >>> Full Name: HansPeter Roesli > >>> Email Address: address@hidden > >>> Organization: EUMETSAT > >>> Package Version: 2.9u4 build date:@DATE@ > >>> Operating System: Windows 7 > >>> Hardware: Java: home: C:\Program Files\IDV_2.9u4\jre version: 1.6.0_20 > >>> j3d:1.5.2 fcs (build4) > >>> Description of problem: Hi - > >>> > >>> Wind barbs do not scale correctly. They scale like flow vectors and other > >>> point observations. The problem is that the zoom factor is not taken into > >>> account when the barbs are first drawn. > >>> > >>> cheers, HP > >>> > >>> > >> > >> HP, > >> > >> Thanks for submitting this bug report, I will fix it after the AMS. > >> > >> > >> Yuan > > > > > > Ticket Details > > =================== > > Ticket ID: VTX-233380 > > Department: Support IDV > > Priority: Normal > > Status: Closed > > > > Ticket Details =================== Ticket ID: VTX-233380 Department: Support IDV Priority: Normal Status: Open