[IDV #PNW-510251]: NOAA Profiler Plots

On Mon, 13 Dec 2010, Laura Landry wrote:

> New Client Reply: NOAA Profiler Plots
>
> Yuan,
> Has anyone had a chance to address my ticket items that I sent prior to the 
> Unidata Workshop?
>
> Laura


Laura,
  I made some changes after the workshop and I am in the AGU this week, I
will let you know after the conference and more tests.


Yuan
>
> >>> "Unidata IDV Support" <address@hidden> 10/19/2010 3:48 PM >>>
> > Good Morning Yuan,
> > Just checking in on the progress behind using MADIS Cooperative Agency 
> > Profiler network data in the IDV. Specifically:
> > 1) When do you project the profiler station plots will be available?
> >
> > 2) Has there been any progress on a better y-axis display as you mentioned 
> > in a previous email? This was in reference to the option that allows the 
> > most recent data to be located on the right side of the chart as opposed to 
> > the left. When clicked, the height expands making the data appear to shrink 
> > into a very small vertical layer.
> >
> > 3) Have you had a chance to look into the vertical extent issue (see below 
> > for reference)?
> >
> > 4) I noticed that the wind barbs do not appear to not match the input 
> > data's magnitude. See attached IDV-generated and MADIS-generated charts for 
> > time/height wind barb plots on 9/26/2007 at 12-18 UTC. Note that IDV's 
> > highest color range has been changed to 50 kts (red) and the chart shows 
> > ~30 kts (yellow) as highest wind speeds for this time period. However, the 
> > problem lies in the wind barb icon itself - the yellow wind barbs have a 50 
> > kt-flag and extra barb indicating wind speeds of ~60 kts instead. Double 
> > checking the data using MADIS-generated charts shows that the IDV color 
> > scheme is correct and the IDV wind barb icons are wrong. Can this be fixed?
> >
> > 5) Is adding the option to choose the data's QC level still a consideration?
> >
> > Laura
>
> Hi Laura,
>     I will put this support ticket on hold status, and promise to check it 
> after the training workshop.
>
>
> Yuan
> >
> > >>> "Unidata IDV Support" <address@hidden> 9/2/2010 6:41 PM >>>
> > > > Yuan,
> > > > Here's some additional feedback on the new features.
> > > > 1) Image capture: Thanks for adding the capture feature in the 
> > > > time/height profiler display. It works very well when choosing "View" 
> > > > in the Capture What options. However, the other two options of "View & 
> > > > Legend" and "Full Window" prompt an error and no image can be captured.
> > >
> > > Yes, we knew this bug, and we were working on it.
> >
> > The new 2.9u1 release should have fixed this.
> >
> >
> > Yuan
> > > >
> > > > 2) Time/Height chart: I took a look at the y-axis fix that you've added 
> > > > and I think there may be a bug. The attachment called 
> > > > TimeHt_STWMA_latestL.jpg shows that loading the local profiler netCDF 
> > > > files creates a nice Time/Height chart, however; the display changed 
> > > > after I toggled the "Latest data on left" selection. The y-axis 
> > > > suddenly increased its vertical extent as shown by 
> > > > TimeHt_STWMA_latestR.jpg.
> > >
> > > I need to find a better design for the y-axis.
> > > >
> > > > 3) To magnify the vertical extent of the profiler data (See #3 in last 
> > > > email), I used the vertical scale icon as you suggested. Thank you for 
> > > > pointing this out, it should work nicely. One item to note is that one 
> > > > of the profilers (PNRMD) is a high elevation site that is located in 
> > > > Frostburg, MD with an elevation of 763 meters. Using the vertical scale 
> > > > icon, it is more apparent that the data point closest to the surface is 
> > > > also magnified. This can be a problem because the profiler's data look 
> > > > to originate in PA instead of MD. The other 2 attachments illustrate 
> > > > this: 3D_PNRMD_VertScaleMax-6000m.jpg (actual data origin) and 
> > > > 3D_PNRMD_VertScaleMax-500m.jpg (station looks to be located in PA). Is 
> > > > it possible to make the data point closest to the surface maintain its 
> > > > original fixed height while the vertical scale adjustment is being used?
> > > >
> > > I will check, this maybe a 3D illusion. When the station plot is 
> > > available, this 3D illusion will be less concern.
> > >
> > >
> > > Yuan
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Laura
> > > >
> > > > >>> "Unidata IDV Support" <address@hidden> 8/11/2010 6:34 PM >>>
> > > > > Hi Yuan,
> > > > > I have been working with the CAP profiler winds display using local 
> > > > > netCDF files. First, I would like to say that I can load the files 
> > > > > with ease and have successfully used both the time/height display and 
> > > > > the 3D plot. Thank you for your extensive work on this. I do have a 
> > > > > few questions and they are listed below.
> > > > >
> > > > > 1) I see that the time/height and 3D plots are available. Do you 
> > > > > anticipate adding the profiler station plot also?
> > > > >
> > > > Well, this is a easier one. I will add it soon.
> > > >
> > > > > 2) Time/height display: Is there a way to capture an image of the 
> > > > > time/height display control window? Also, is the y-axis adjustable so 
> > > > > that it can be changed to above ground level (AGL) labeled every 500 
> > > > > meters as opposed to MSL labeled every 2000 meters? This would 
> > > > > account for the lower heights measured by CAP boundary layer 
> > > > > profilers compared to NOAA profilers that can reach up to tropopause.
> > > > >
> > > > No, you can not capture an image, but I will add this feature soon. If 
> > > > you download the nightly build tomorrow, the y-axis label is better 
> > > > now, may not be what you wanted, let me know if you like it or not.
> > > >
> > > > > 3) Most (if not all) of the CAP profiler network measures winds in 
> > > > > the boundary layer (up to approximately 4 km AGL) whereas the NPN 
> > > > > measures up to around 9-16 km AGL, depending on its vertical sampling 
> > > > > mode. This height difference makes for a much different looking 3D 
> > > > > plot with CAP data - the 3D plot looks a bit cramped, vertically. 
> > > > > While this display is draw to scale and accurate, is there a way to 
> > > > > artificially magnify the height of the CAP profiler data so that the 
> > > > > vertical extent is expanded? Perhaps a drop down menu in the display 
> > > > > settings that magnifies the height 2x, 3x, etc?
> > > >
> > > > If you want to adjust the vertical scale in the map view, click the 
> > > > vertical scale icon on the left of the window, and change the value, it 
> > > > will give you the same effect as magnifies the height.
> > > > >
> > > > > My reasoning behind this is that I hope to be able to create a 3D 
> > > > > plot showing 3 profilers in 1 map view: a MD profiler (BLTMD), NJ 
> > > > > profiler (RUTNJ), and NC profiler (CHANC). At the present time, 
> > > > > without magnification of the data's vertical extent, it would be 
> > > > > extremely difficult to see the wind barbs/colors for each profiler 
> > > > > with the level of zoom required to get all 3 profilers in the same 
> > > > > map view.
> > > > >
> > > > > 4) My previous question about plotting different QC levels of the 
> > > > > data may be better illustrated by viewing the MADIS CAP Profiler 
> > > > > Real-Time Data Display 
> > > > > (http://madis-data.noaa.gov/cap/profiler.jsp?options=full)
> > > > >
> > > > > Note that on this site, you can select an option in the drop down QC 
> > > > > menu such as "Pass Level 1" and "Applied and Pass Level 2". These 
> > > > > options will filter the data based on QC flags designated by MADIS. 
> > > > > The flags are also in the netCDF files. You can see this by selecting 
> > > > > a local netCDF file I've uploaded in Data Choosers and select "I'm 
> > > > > feeling lucky" as the data source type instead of "CDM netCDF 
> > > > > profiler files". Then click 3D grid and you will see the IDV lists a 
> > > > > few QC flag fields. More information on the applied QC is here 
> > > > > (http://madis.noaa.gov/madis_sfc_qc.html). However, this might be a 
> > > > > better question for the MADIS contacts I sent earlier today. They 
> > > > > would likely be able to explain the file setup much more easily. 
> > > > > Ideally I would want an option to select and plot the best available 
> > > > > data (Applied and Pass Level 2).
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > This is interesting, I will put it in our to do list.
> > > >
> > > > > Let me know if you need more clarification.
> > > > >
> > > > > Laura
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Ticket Details
> > > > ===================
> > > > Ticket ID: PNW-510251
> > > > Department: Support IDV
> > > > Priority: Normal
> > > > Status: Closed
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > Ticket Details
> > ===================
> > Ticket ID: PNW-510251
> > Department: Support IDV
> > Priority: Normal
> > Status: Closed
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> Ticket Details
> ===================
> Ticket ID: PNW-510251
> Department: Support IDV
> Priority: Normal
> Status: On Hold
>
>
>
>
>
>
> The information contained in this communication may be confidential, is 
> intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally 
> privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you 
> are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this 
> communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited.  If you have 
> received this communication in error, please re-send this communication to 
> the sender and delete the original message and any copy of it from your 
> computer system. Thank You
>
>
>
> Ticket Details
> ===================
> Ticket ID: PNW-510251
> Department: Support IDV
> Priority: Normal
> Status: Open
> Link:  
> https://www.unidata.ucar.edu/esupport/staff/index.php?_m=tickets&_a=viewticket&ticketid=11751
>



Ticket Details
===================
Ticket ID: PNW-510251
Department: Support IDV
Priority: Normal
Status: Open