This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
Hi Brian- > I've uploaded a zipped IDV bundle called simpledifference.zidv. The > comparison is between two precipitation fields. In this file, the fields > are unitless, but I have tried specifying mm in the text file header and > using newUnit on the vis5d file and get the same result. Thanks for the files. You definitely need to do the newUnit on the Vis5D data. I can get it to work if I subtract the v5d from the gridded point obs, but not the other way around. I'll look into that further when I get into the office. Don > -----Original Message----- > From: Unidata IDV Support [mailto:address@hidden] > Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 3:52 AM > To: Billings, Dr. Brian, Contractor, Code 7533 > Cc: address@hidden > Subject: [IDV #WWB-790357]: simple difference on objective analyses > > Hi Brian- > > > Full Name: Brian Billings > > Email Address: address@hidden > > Organization: Naval Research Laboratory Package Version: 2.7u2 > > Operating System: Windows Vista > > Hardware: > > Description of problem: Have any issues been reported on using the > simple difference formula where one of the fields is an objective > analysis of point data? I have been trying to use this option on a 2D > vis5d file and a text data listing. The times are the same and the units > are the same, but the results are obviously incorrect. The users guide > says that the calculation is automatically performed only on the area in > which the grids overlap, but this is not being done in my output. Is the > issue with using an objective analysis or some other possibility? > Thanks. > > If you are subtracting temperatures, the values will end up in K so if > you convert to Celsius you'll be off by a factor of 273. The IDV does > not distinguish between delta degrees K and regular K so a conversion > between units will treat them as absolute. > > If that's not what you are seeing, could you upload the vis5d file and > the text data to: > > http://motherlode.ucar.edu/repository/alias/idvupload > > so I can take a look. Let me know what field you are trying this with. > > Don Murray > > > > > > > Ticket Details > =================== > Ticket ID: WWB-790357 > Department: Support IDV > Priority: Normal > Status: Open > > Ticket Details =================== Ticket ID: WWB-790357 Department: Support IDV Priority: Normal Status: Open