This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
> Hi Jeff > > Further to my former email. I now checked with considerably larger image > volume than I did before. With Xmx1200m I got again missing frames. I > then lowered to Xmx1024m and everything is fine again. Then I tried with > a really large volume that before had finally almost al frame deleted. > This time just half a frame is missing. > > I think I will keep Xmx1024m for the time being. It appears "optimum" > for my applications. Nevertheless, it is my feeling that we have some > strange behaviour here. NTW: I never mentioned it, there are no error > messages going with missing frames. > > HP, This is very odd behavior. Can you send a bundle that this problem shows up with? -Jeff Ticket Details =================== Ticket ID: YND-789009 Department: Support IDV Priority: Normal Status: Open