[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Support #DMB-963596]: Re: UF LDM upgrade

This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.

  • Subject: [Support #DMB-963596]: Re: UF LDM upgrade
  • Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 10:06:40 -0600
Donna,

As Steve Emmerson explained, it is correct behavior for pqinsert not to insert
a duplicate product, so it exits with a clean zero status because no abnormal
condition was encountered (eg, the product is in the queue, which was the 
desired result).

Steve Chiswell
Unidata User Support


> Matt,
> 
> I remember Steve Chizwell telling us on March 5th (I think it was then)
> that the pqinsert program completes (regardless of actual result) and
> returns 0 but there is supposed to be a result flag to look for.
> 
> Do I remember that correctly?
> 
> -Donna
> --
> Donna Cote
> Senior Research Associate
> The Academy for Advanced Telecommunications and Learning Technologies
> Texas A&M University
> 3139 TAMU
> College Station, Texas 77843-3139
> Office: (979) 862-3982
> Cell: (979) 324-3549
> Fax: (979) 862-3983
> 
> 
> Smith, Matt wrote:
> > That's a good point Justin.  Gerry, can you ping Unidata about that bug?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Matt
> >
> > Matt Smith
> > Information Technology & Systems Center
> > University of Alabama in Huntsville
> > at the National Space Science and Technology Center
> > 320 Sparkman Dr.
> > Huntsville, AL 35805
> > ph 256-961-7809     fax 256-961-7859
> > e-mail address@hidden
> >
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: SCOOP project LDM administrators and interested parties
> >> [mailto:address@hidden] On Behalf Of Justin R. Davis
> >> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 9:45 AM
> >> To: address@hidden
> >> Subject: [SCOOP-LDM] UF LDM upgrade
> >>
> >> Just FYI, UF has upgraded its LDM from 6.5.1 to 6.6.3.
> >>
> >> For what its worth, I used the LDM "recommended" way to upgrade
> >> quickly (during a quiet insert period):
> >>
> >>    ldmadmin stop && rm -f runtime && ln -s ldm-6.6.3 runtime &&
> >>
> > ldmadmin
> >
> >> start
> >>
> >> Also, the "Product already in queue:" message still produces $?=0
> >>
> >> jrd
> >>
> >> PS  I also checked the time on our machine and we are still within
> >>
> > 0.01s.
> >
> >> On Thu, 5 Apr 2007, Donna Cote wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Dave, Matt,
> >>>
> >>> It appears to me that vims' LDM server went down yesterday, late
> >>>
> >> afternoon.
> >>
> >>> Matt, if you can run a notifyme or ldmping, let me know; because I'll
> >>>
> >> look
> >>
> >>> again at our config. -Donna
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Dave, would you please provide Gerry and me a copy of both your
> >>>>
> >> ldmd.conf
> >>
> >>>> and pqact.conf file?
> >>>>
> >>>> For some reason the vims machine isn't allowing us to connect.
> >>>>
> > Neither
> >
> >> LSU
> >>
> >>>> nor TAMU...
> >>>> We want to debug this.
> >>>>
> >>>> -Donna
> >>>>
> >>>
> 
> 


Ticket Details
===================
Ticket ID: DMB-963596
Department: Support IDD SCOOP
Priority: Normal
Status: Closed