[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 20050609:I2 vs commodity SJose -> UAF

This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.

  • Subject: Re: 20050609:I2 vs commodity SJose -> UAF
  • Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 10:07:30 -0600 (MDT)
Hi Jim et al,

U of Wash feeds from us (UCAR) via I2, and would go to UAF/GI on I2 as
well so suspect latencies to be quite low..


We are using the LDM, quite easy to re-configure to ingest from U of Wash
instead of SJSU..just edit the ldmd.conf file in ~ldm/etc..and stop and
re-start.

So yes and yes...;)

We will dial this in at your convenience,

Jeff
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeff Weber                                    address@hidden        :
Unidata Program Center                        PH:303-497-8676        :
University Corp for Atmospheric Research      3300 Mitchell Ln       :
http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/staff/jweber      Boulder,Co 80307-3000  :
---------------------------------------------------------------------

On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, Jim Williams wrote:

> We're starting to step out of my area of exptertise (I'm just a security
> geek who knows a little bit about networking).  Tim Larrabee is the better
> person to talk to & he's out of the office until Monday.  With that
> disclaimer, here goes nothin':
>
> Jeff - Can you get a conduit to UW?  What does the sjsu <-> UW path look
> like latency-wise?
>
> Rob - What are you using to catch the data from sjsu?  If its not a
> traditional file transfer app like ftp/sftp/scp/whatever, can it be
> configured to grab the datastream from an UW address instead of the sjsu
> address?
>
> If the answers to both of the above are yes and the latency on the conduit
> is lower than the sjsu <-> firberstar path then it sounds like a good choice
> to me.
>
> Jeff Weber wrote:
> > Hi Jim et al,
> >
> [snip]
> --
> Jim Williams, CISSP                           PGP Key: http://pgp.mit.edu/
> Systems and Network Security Officer           ID 0x4C4D9F19
> University of Alaska Fairbanks
> P.O. Box 757700
> 303 Tanana Dr. Rm 237                 Voice: 907-474-7404
> Fairbanks, AK 99775-7700              fax:   907-474-5910
>