[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 20050609:I2 vs commodity SJose -> UAF

This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.

  • Subject: Re: 20050609:I2 vs commodity SJose -> UAF
  • Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 09:52:48 -0600 (MDT)
Hi Rob,

Sounds like a plan, we'll do that...

Jeff
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeff Weber                                    address@hidden        :
Unidata Program Center                        PH:303-497-8676        :
University Corp for Atmospheric Research      3300 Mitchell Ln       :
http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/staff/jweber      Boulder,Co 80307-3000  :
---------------------------------------------------------------------

On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, Rob Cermak wrote:

> Jeff,
>
> I think we got a warning from Jim and Tim saying that the commodity feed
> will be swamped when the students return in the Fall.   Since we relay
> to Rorik @ GI, it may be very prudent to change to an I2 site.
>
> I will be way until July 5th.  The machines will at that time will
> likely be changing addresses, lets realign everything when I return.
>
> Rob
>
> > Hi Jim et al,
> >
> > SJSU is NOT and I2 site...that is the problem.
> >
> > Would you like for me to secure an I2 for the CONDUIT feed, it would
> > probably decrease any latencies...
> >
> > It would probably be U of Washington.. I2 peers with Pacific Northwest.
> >
> > ...if ok with U of W.
> >
> > I think that is the best solution..thoughts?
>
>