This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
> Steve, > Thanks for all your help with this. I really appreciate finally being > able to resolve this problem. One last question - is there a way to > display a color bar (I'm using GPMAP) for the wind speeds? I tried > IMCBAR and CLRBAR but didn't get anything. . . > > Thanks, > Greg > Greg, The legend gets plotted by default (eg no way to turn it off) in the current distribution. I didn't have the NCEP routine initially when I first added the product, but now that the NCEP dist has all the infrastructure for QSCT, I use that. Steve Chiswell Unidata User SUpport > Unidata GEMPAK Support wrote: > > Greg, > > > > each of the 9 regions has data broadcast in chunks, so there are many > > ISXX05 products > > for example that make up that region of the plot. The gap you see is due to > > the plot/data time. > > > > I have noticed that NESDIS has WMO header times up to 5 hours in the future, > > eg, the $GEMDATA/wsct directory files being created by the LDM FILE > > action have future dates, which is problematic. You may want to try a > > pattern > > such as: > > > > HRS ^ISXX(..) KNES ([0-3][0-9])([0-2][0-9])([0-6][0-9]) > > FILE data/gempak/qsct/%Y%m%d%H.bufr > > > > The above will file the products according to product iunsertion time, > > rather than the > > patterns grabbed from the WMO bulletin times. > > > > The 5.10.4 distribution has an option in $GEMTBL/config/prefs.tbl > > to control the time range window for the QSCT/ASCT/QBUF etc plots. > > > > You may find it convenient to use the NMAP2 > > gui data->misc->qbuf to plot/loop > > the Quikscat data as well rather than using "last" in gpmap.. > > > > Steve Chiswell > > Unidata User SUpport > > > > > >> Steve, > >> Thanks for the reference - I understand now the coverage of these > >> data. One more question though - I ran my same script again this morning > >> with a garea=-20;180;60;0. I got the following plot which looks more > >> like what I expected but there is a large chunk of data missing south of > >> Mexico between 90 and 100 W. I'm wondering why such a large chunk of > >> data is missing. Is this fairly typical? Also - Is there a way to plot > >> more than the last 4-hours worth of data? > >> > >> Thanks - sorry for all the questions, > >> Gregs > >> > >> > >> Unidata GEMPAK Support wrote: > >>> Greg, > >>> > >>> The region of coverage for each of the ISXX01 through ISXX09 > >>> is shown in figure 3 in the PDF which you can find here: > >>> http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/70665.pdf > >>> > >>> Note that the region of coverage is 130E to 35W. > >>> Your map region is too far east. The region of swath coverage for > >>> 4 hours should show 3 swaths more or less. > >>> > >>> Try just setting GAREA = -90;-180;90;180 and PROJ=CED to see the > >>> general coverage now that you have verified that you are FILE'ing > >>> the data and it is being located on your disk through the datatype.tbl > >>> entry. > >>> > >>> Steve Chiswell > >>> Unidata User Support > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>> Steve, > >>>> The QBUF data are being picked up from the HRS feed as shown on your > >>>> quikscat example web page. I'm not sure sure how to tell if HRS is > >>>> coming from NOAAPORT or not. Would you like me to send you a sample QBUF > >>>> file from our server? > >>>> > >>>> Also - since I'm not specifiying the the QBUF file in the SATFIL > >>>> field what assumptions are being made about where the files exist that > >>>> it is trying to get? > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Greg > >>>> > >>>> Unidata GEMPAK Support wrote: > >>>>> Greg, > >>>>> > >>>>> What version and OS are you running. There have > >>>>> been some bugs fixed along the way so can never rule > >>>>> out checking current distributions. > >>>>> > >>>>> John's problem however as sent to me (though he never > >>>>> actually provided me with his input to GPMAP) was that he was trying to > >>>>> set SATFIL as his QBUF file. These are not images however. You > >>>>> can overlay on a satellite image, but the qbuf data are not > >>>>> what get set in SATFIL. You must store the ISXX bufr messages from > >>>>> NOAAPORT > >>>>> and you must have the QBUF data type defined in datatype.tbl to match > >>>>> the > >>>>> file'd name/location. The bufr data on NOAAPORT are not the grids from > >>>>> JPL > >>>>> displayable as QSCT however so be sure that you are using the NOAAPORT > >>>>> data if you are using the QBUF entry. > >>>>> > >>>>> Other than that, please provide your settings in GPMAP and/or NMAP2. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> Steve, > >>>>>> We are working with John Merrill of URI on a project called PASE - > >>>>>> Pacific Atmospheric Sulfur Experiment. I hear he was having exactly the > >>>>>> same problems I was having in getting anything more than a blank plot > >>>>>> when trying to plot QuikSCAT winds with GPMAP. This is something I had > >>>>>> given up on because we were never able to make it work. I'm wondering > >>>>>> if > >>>>>> you have come across others who have this same problem and whether you > >>>>>> have any idea of how to solve the problem? I know it works on Unidata > >>>>>> machines but there must be some other piece missing that we don't have > >>>>>> and don't know we are missing. . . > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Greg > > -- > > ~~N~A~T~I~O~N~A~L~~C~E~N~T~E~R~~F~O~R~~A~T~M~O~S~.~~R~E~S~E~A~R~C~H > Greg Stossmeister e-mail: address@hidden > NCAR/EOL phone: (303)497-8692 > P.O. Box 3000 web: http://www.eol.ucar.edu > Boulder, CO 80307-3000 > ~~~~~~~~E~A~R~T~H~~~O~B~S~E~R~V~I~N~G~~~L~A~B~O~R~A~T~O~R~Y~~~~~~~~ > > Ticket Details =================== Ticket ID: LEY-181797 Department: Support GEMPAK Priority: Normal Status: Closed