NSF Unidata

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

19990105: Problem setting Nsat enhancement default

This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.



James,

The ID number for GOES10 is 74. The problem with copying 
the GOES-9 entry is that GOES-9 was 72, GOES-8 is 70
(The sounders onboard are instrument numbers 71, 73, 75).
 for example,
GOES10               VIS          30    220     74      1      0 vis_upc.tbl
GOES10               IR_3.9        0    255     74      2      0 GRAY
GOES10               WV_6.7        0    255     74      4      0 wv_upc.tbl
GOES10               IR_10.7       0    255     74      8      0 ir_upc.tbl
GOES10               IR_12.0       0    255     74    128      0 GRAY

The "raw" flag "1" would be used for uncalibrated images; however, all the
IDD AREAfiles are calibrated, so the brightness values are 0 through 255.

Steve Chiswell
Unidata User Support


>From: address@hidden (James Murakami)
>Organization: .
>Keywords: 199901052021.NAA11587

>Hi:
>
>I was trying to change the default satellite imagery
>enhancement type. I had no problem with GOES-8 imagery,
>but GOES-10 imagery didn't work. That is, a new default
>didn't occur when selecting any images. One had to manually
>select a different enhancement type through the "color
>enhancement" option window.
>
>I made changes in the "imgtyp.tbl" file. Part of it looks
>as follows--
>
>! SATELLITE IMAGE TYPES
>! ---------------------
>!
>!                   |IMG     |      |      |SAT ID|IMGTYP|   RAW| DEFAULT     
>  |!SAT ID             |TYP     |   MIN|   MAX|NUMBER|NUMBER|  FLAG| LUT FILE 
>     |!(20)               |(8)     |   (6)|   (6)|   (6)|   (6)|   (6)|      (
> 14)    |!                   |        |      |      |      |      |      | 
>GOES8                VIS          30    220     70      1      0 vis_upc.tbl
>GOES8                IR2           0    255     70      2      0 ir_sab.tbl
>GOES8                WV            0    255     70      4      0 watvap.tbl
>GOES8                IR            0    255     70      8      0 ir_za.tbl
>GOES8                IR            0    255     70    128      0 ir_za.tbl
>GOES8                VIS          30    220     70      1      1 GRAY
>GOES8                IR2           0    255     70      2      1 ir_za.tbl
>GOES8                IR            0    255     70      8      1 ir_za.tbl
>GOES8                IR            0    255     70    128      1 ir_za.tbl
>GOES10               VIS          30    220     72      1      0 vis_upc.tbl
>GOES10               IR2           0    255     72      2      0 ir_za.tbl
>GOES10               WV            0    255     72      4      0 watvap.tbl
>GOES10               IR            0    255     72      8      0 ir_za.tbl
>GOES10               IR            0    255     72    128      0 ir_za.tbl
>GOES10               VIS           0  30240     72      1      1 GRAY
>GOES10               IR2           0    255     72      2      1 ir_za.tbl
>GOES10               IR            0  26624     72      8      1 ir_za.tbl
>GOES10               IR            0  26624     72    128      1 ir_za.tbl
>GOES10               WV            0    255     72      4      1 watvap.tbl
>
>I had just copied the GOES-9 section and changed the GOES-9 to GOES-10.
>I wasn't sure of the differences in the various "IR" lines. I wrote in
>a new "ir_za.tbl" for infrared imagery (this was added to the "enhance.tbl"
>file). GOES-8 imagery responded but not GOES-10 pics.
>
>It may have something to do an error I see when viewing any GOES-10
>imagery. An example follows when using Nsat--
>
>###filename -- /gempak2/sat/GOES-10/4km/IR/IR_990105_1900
> [IM 1]  No image type entry for file /gempak2/sat/GOES-10/4km/IR/IR_990105_19
> 00
>
>
>The "No image type" statement appears on all GOES-10 images but not GOES-8
>pics. Images appear but not with the desired default enhancement.
>
>What am I omitting or typing in improperly?
>
>Sincerely,
>
>James Murakami
>
>Staff Meteorologist/Student Affairs
>Department of Atmospheric Sciences
>University of California, Los Angeles
>405 Hilgard Ave.
>Los Angeles, CA  90095-1565
>
>
>   e-mail:  address@hidden
>telephone:  310-825-2418
>      Fax:  310-206-5219
>