Re: missed GFS 1 degree data from CONDUIT

Hi Steve and Pete,

I would prefer this change occur (early) next week ... I have to get all naming conventions from 
ftpprd ... I may even have them around here some place.  I will need to change some of my pqact 
entries, and so will some of my local users.  When is good for you Pete?

I assume the GRIB2 also be available?  I also assume only the paths change, and
the individual grib message names will stay the same.

Will the tgsv32.nws.noaa.gov still feed some sites?   I use flood.atmos.uiuc.edu as a backup ... I 
realize that I'll have to have both the old and the new pqact entries, but since the checksum should 
still eliminate duplicates, that shouldn't be a problem.

Thanks,

Jerry



Steve Chiswell wrote:
> Pete and Jerry,
>
> I would like to ensure that Jerry is getting the best possible data
> delivery from
> CONDUIT. At the same time, we need to proceed with the upgrade of
> CONDUIT to
> the new NCEP ldmhost which aside from providing a redundant host at the
> source of
> data insertion to the LDM will increase the amount of data available to
> sites.
> While this has been a time of vaction schedules for many people, we
> probably
> want to move forward if at all possible.
>
> The complicating factor is that the data set names will transition from
> the tgftp.nws.noaa.gov file names to the ftpprd.ncep.noaa.gov file
> names.
> If Jerry is willing to work with the new file names, I can get the new
> data
> turned on to his host immediately.  We can proceed with just the
> 1 degree data files, or the entire feed as desired.
>
>
> Steve Chiswell
> Unidata User Support
>
>
>
> On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 13:43 -0500, Pete Pokrandt wrote:
> > In a previous message to me, you wrote: 
> >
> >  >
> >  >Pete,
> >  >  Unfortunately, I only keep the data from the last couple of days, so I can'
> >   >t check from over the 
> >  >weekend.  The user has told me that they have missed data other than from the
> >   > 6 UTC run....
> >  >
> >  >I was able to look at 7/31 ... no GFS messages were missed that day.
> >
> > Ok, keep an eye on things, let me know if reception improves now that
> > I have rescheduled the backup to try to fall in between gfs runs.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Pete
> >
> >  >
> >  >So far Today:
> >  >
> >  >RUN=00 DAY=20060801 NONE missing
> >  >RUN=06 DAY=20060801
> >  >20060801 run=06 forecast=045 expected=328 actual=327
> >  >20060801 run=06 forecast=048 expected=328 actual=234
> >  >20060801 run=06 forecast=051 expected=328 actual=236
> >  >20060801 run=06 forecast=054 expected=328 actual=294
> >  >20060801 run=06 forecast=057 expected=328 actual=290
> >  >20060801 run=06 forecast=060 expected=328 actual=297
> >  >20060801 run=06 forecast=063 expected=328 actual=311
> >  >20060801 run=06 forecast=066 expected=328 actual=326
> >  >20060801 run=06 forecast=069 expected=328 actual=327
> >  >RUN=12 DAY=20060801 NONE missing
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >Jerry
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >Steve Chiswell wrote:
> >  >> Jerry,
> >  >> 
> >  >> Can you send me your "request" lines related to CONDUIT for your ldm
> >  >> so that I can see if this might be related to an auto shifting problem.
> >  >> Note that motherlode is downstream of f5 at U. Wisc. so that
> >  >> might be an issue in what you are looking at.
> >  >> 
> >  >> Steve Chiswell
> >  >> Unidata User Support
> >  >> 
> >  >> 
> >  >> On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 11:34, Jerrold Robaidek wrote:
> >  >>> Hi,
> >  >>>
> >  >>> Has anyone else noticed that over the last few weeks, some of the CONDUIT 
> >   >1 degree GFS data has been 
> >  >>> missed?  It's been happening for a few weeks, but today was the first time
> >   > we compared our missing 
> >  >>> to what motherlode received (or missed).
> >  >>>
> >  >>> Here is an example:
> >  >>> The status file indicates that there should be 328 grib messages for 20060
> >   >801 06 UTC run, the 48 
> >  >>> hour forecast.
> >  >>>
> >  >>> Motherlode got 227
> >  >>> We(pepe) got  234
> >  >>>
> >  >>> I can not pin point the exact day this began, but one of our users has not
> >   >iced intermittent missing 
> >  >>> data for at least a couple of weeks
> >  >>>
> >  >>> Thanks,
> >  >>>
> >  >>> Jerry
> >  >>>
> >  >>>
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >-- 
> >  >Jerrold Robaidek                       Email:  address@hidden
> >  >SSEC Data Center                       Phone: (608) 262-6025
> >  >University of Wisconsin                Fax: (608) 263-6738
> >  >Madison, Wisconsin
> >  >
> >  >=============================================================================
> >   >==
> >  >To unsubscribe conduit, visit:
> >  >http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/mailing-list-delete-form.html
> >  >=============================================================================
> >   >==
> >  >
> >
> >
> > --
> > +>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>+<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<+
> > ^ Pete Pokrandt                    V 1447  AOSS Bldg  1225 W Dayton St^
> > ^ Systems Programmer               V Madison,         WI     53706    ^
> > ^                                  V      address@hidden       ^
> > ^ Dept of Atmos & Oceanic Sciences V (608) 262-3086 (Phone/voicemail) ^
> > ^ University of Wisconsin-Madison  V       262-0166 (Fax)             ^
> > <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<+>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>+


--
Jerrold Robaidek                       Email:  address@hidden
SSEC Data Center                       Phone: (608) 262-6025
University of Wisconsin                Fax: (608) 263-6738
Madison, Wisconsin