[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[UDUNITS #XJX-726297]: Request for addition of new 'molecule' unit
- Subject: [UDUNITS #XJX-726297]: Request for addition of new 'molecule' unit
- Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 14:36:29 -0600
Alison,
> I am writing to ask if it is possible for a new unit of 'molecule' to be
> added to the UDUNITS-2 XML database. The unit would be defined as follows:
>
> > <unit>
> > <def>mol/6.02214179e23</def>
Isn't the Avogadro constant 6.02214129e23? See
<http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?na|search_for=physchem_in!>.
> > <name>
> > <singular>molecule</singular>
> > <plural>molecules</plural>
> > </name>
> > <aliases>
> > <name><singular>molec</singular></name>
> > </aliases>
> > </unit>
>
> This request is a result of a recent discussion on the CF-Metadata mailing
> list in which we have agreed to create standard names for eight column
> trace gas quantities with canonical units of mole m-2. However, the
> common practice in the atmospheric chemistry community is to use units
> of molecule cm-2. These latter units could be used in the netCDF file
> and converted to the CF canonical unit if a definition for 'molecule'
> were to be added to UDUNI TS.
It's a possibility.
You could, of course, add this definition to a "local definitions" file (say
"$prefix/share/udunits/udunits2-local.xml"; where "$prefix" is the top-level
installation directory) and then include that file in the file
"$prefix/share/udunits/udunits2.xml". I presume, however, that you would want
this definition to be an "official" unit (i.e., one supported by the UDUNITS-2
package and, consequently, distributed with the package). Correct?
> (The CF discussion started in 2012 at
>
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/2012/056052.html
>
> and following posts in the same thread and recently concluded in
>
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/2013/056207.html
>
> and following posts).
Incidentally, I'm a little surprised to see that you included the word "mole"
in the names of the physical quantities. The NIST frowns on this because it
includes a unit in the name (see section 8.6.2 of
<http://physics.nist.gov/Pubs/SP811/sec08.html>). I would have gone with names
like
areic_amount_of_substance_of_tropospheric_nitrogen_dioxide
Oh well. Not my call. :-)
I'll see about putting "molecules" in the next release -- providing we can
agree on the Avogadro constant.
> Kind regards,
> Alison Pamment (CF Standard Names manager)
>
> ------
> Alison Pamment Tel: +44 1235 778065
> NCAS/British Atmospheric Data Centre Email: address@hidden
> STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
> R25, 2.22
> Harwell Oxford, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K.
Regards,
Steve Emmerson
Ticket Details
===================
Ticket ID: XJX-726297
Department: Support UDUNITS
Priority: Normal
Status: Closed