This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
attached are the example ncml we had during the workshop. ethan is correct that grids cant deal with missing coordinates values. > Hi Michael, > > I don't believe this data can be viewed in the grid viewer. The problem is > that netCDF-java/CDM expects gridded data to have coordinate variables > without any missing values (so it can map between i,j and lat/lon). [John, > please correct me if I'm wrong on this.] An "image" feature type would be > more appropriate. Unfortunately, netCDF-java/CDM doesn't yet have an image > type. > > Outside of that, a few comments regarding some of the variable attributes: > > 1) The valid_* and _FillValue attribute values are all strings. The > strings are typed ("0b", "-90.0f", etc) but somehow ended up as > strings instead of the intended type. > > 2) The variable "lon" has valid_max,min of 90,-90 instead of 180,-180. > > I didn't find the examples we looked at during the workshop. I'll look a bit > more and ask John about them as well. > > Ethan > > > Dear Thredds-Support, > > > > we had been taken place in the Unidata THREDDs workshop this year in > > Boulder and during this > > some of our data was analysed, which we wanted to serve using THREDDs. > > > > We had been advised to add the "FillValue" into our latitude/ longitude > > definitions such > > as the data was supposed to be properly displayed within the Grid View. > > > > We have changed this definition now: > > > > http://gsics.eumetsat.int/thredds/catalog/mfg15NetCDF/catalog.html > > > > but the data itself still does not get properly displayed within ToolsUI, > > Grid View. > > > > Would you be able to give us advise what is still wrong with the data ? > > > > We unfortuneatly did not take back the modified NetCDF files from the > > workshop, which > > would have given us the possibility to cross check our updates. > > > > best regards, > > > > Michael Schick > > > Ticket Details =================== Ticket ID: DRR-610037 Department: Support THREDDS Priority: Normal Status: Closed
Attachment:
W_xx-EUMETSAT-Darmstadt,VIS+IR_IMAGERY,MET7+MTP15_C_EUMS_20090726180000.ncml
Description: Binary data
Attachment:
W_xx-EUMETSAT-Darmstadt,VIS+IR_IMAGERY,MSG2+MSG15_C_EUMS_20090730213009.ncml
Description: Binary data