Thanks again.
-- Ben
On 10/24/06, *John Caron* <address@hidden
<mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
Hi Ben:
If you append "&wantXML" to the showForm URL, you get back the XML
before its been XSL transformed to HTML, eg:
http://motherlode.ucar.edu:9080/thredds/ncServer/fmrc/NCEP/GFS/CONUS_80km/files/GFS_CONUS_80km_20061023_0600.grib1?showForm&wantXML
<http://motherlode.ucar.edu:9080/thredds/ncServer/fmrc/NCEP/GFS/CONUS_80km/files/GFS_CONUS_80km_20061023_0600.grib1?showForm&wantXML>
unfortunately, the returned XML is an unpublished format, and may
change in the future. ignore the vertCoord amd missing stuff, and
you see its a list of the available variables and what forecast
hours they are available at. The forecast hours do change for some
models depending on the run time. This is a complication for
operational models like NCEP.
the XML returned by WCS is standardized but more complicated, eg:
http://motherlode.ucar.edu:9080/thredds/wcs/fmrc/NCEP/GFS/CONUS_80km/files/GFS_CONUS_80km_20061023_0600.grib1?request=GetCapabilities&version=1.0.0&service=WCS
<http://motherlode.ucar.edu:9080/thredds/wcs/fmrc/NCEP/GFS/CONUS_80km/files/GFS_CONUS_80km_20061023_0600.grib1?request=GetCapabilities&version=1.0.0&service=WCS>
we have a new "latest" dataset that should be useful. What problem
are you trying to solve with knowing the available forecast hours?
Ben Domenico wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As many of you know, I've been working on scripts to automate the
> delivery and processing of subsets of datasets from TDS sites. I've
> managed to make this work for a few of the model output datasets
(NAM,
> RUC on motherloade, WRF on lead4). However, it is clear that the
> approach I'm using -- basically scraping the HTML of the netCDFserver
> form for selecting variables, bounding boxes and forecast times --
> presents problems because the HTML is very different for different
> models. In some cases, it actually seems to change from time to time
> even for the same model. Robb has mentioned XML documents that
contain
> much of the same information in a more systematic and/or consistent
> format. I think that would be a better approach. Maybe the WCS
> interactions might be a better approach.
>
> An example of the difficulties that arise is the fact that different
> variables have different forecast times and the lists appear in a
> variety of different ways in the netCDFserver forms for different
models.
>
> Please send me whatever suggestions you have for the best way to
proceed.
>
> Thanks.
>
> -- Ben
>
> PS I realize this is probably not the best time to be distracting you
> from the training workshop but I thought I'd mention it while it is
> fresh in my mind.