This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
Woops realized that I simply responded to John. Peter -- Peter Cornillon Graduate School of Oceanography - Telephone: (401) 874-6283 University of Rhode Island - FAX: (401) 874-6728 Narragansett RI 02882 USA - Internet: address@hidden
--- Begin Message ---
- Subject: Re: latest Catalog XML
- Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2002 10:43:55 -0400
Hi all, An interesting discussion. I wrestled a bit with this around the time of the DODS developers meeting last January. I have attached a table that I put together to help me keep track of the issues. I think that you have progressed way beyond this, but thought that you might find it interesting anyway. Peter John Caron wrote: > > heres another strawman, incorporating our latest discussions: > > http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/projects/THREDDS/xml/InvCatalog.0.6d.dtd > > Recent changes: > > 1) Collections as datasets. Ethan and I think the cleanest way to allow > "collections as datasets" is to allow nested datasets. Collections remain > just groups of datasets. A Collection as a dataset is done as a dataset with > nested datasets. Nested dataset elements (Joe's meaning #2) should imply (in > some way we need to clarify better) nested datasets (Joe's meaning #1 and > #3). > > 2) allow compound services again. I have talked myself into that these will > be often useful. > > 3) services are now contained within any collection, rather than having to > be all in the top catalog element. They are scoped by the collection they > are in (so we no longer use ID, since those are global). This makes a > catalogRef have (almost) the same semantics as a collection. > > 4) a catalog now only has exactly one collection element. (i considered > eliminating catalog but i think its better this way). > > 5) "attribute" changed to "property" (tired of saying "the attribute > attribute") > > 6) access element can specify an absolute URL with a serverType -or- a > reletive URL with a serverID. > > Unless I get a barrage of objections, I will document this in more detail > ASAP. I will be gone for a week starting next Tuesdy, so Ethan will continue > the conversation as needed. Hopefully, we can converge soon and take a > break! I think I have incorporated all the good ideas i have heard in this > discussion. Have I left out something, or do you think any feature is not > worth the complexity? -- Peter Cornillon Graduate School of Oceanography - Telephone: (401) 874-6283 University of Rhode Island - FAX: (401) 874-6728 Narragansett RI 02882 USA - Internet: address@hiddenTitle: Oceanology International
--- End Message ---