This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
Hi Maggie, I suspect something in their pqact.conf file...but that is just a guess. <snip> I have the sa09 files coming in at 08 and 38 instead of 05 and 35 to try to reduce the data volume and thats working on our end. <snip> Are these the only ones that get processed at a different time? This seems like more than coincidence... The more info we can get from them the better, a log in would be ideal ;) Keep me posted! -Jeff ____________________________ _____________________ Jeff Weber address@hidden Unidata Support PH:303-497-8676 COMET Case Study Library FX:303-497-8690 University Corp for Atmospheric Research 3300 Mitchell Ln http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/staff/jweber Boulder,Co 80307-3000 ________________________________________ ______________________ On Mon, 21 Apr 2003, Maggie Sleziak wrote: > Hello Jeff, > > Well, Kirk gets data from SA09 from us. The last 5 digits are the > seconds therefore if we get a file with the last 5 numbers those are 30 > minute files, and if not, then those are all daily files. > > The thing is that they suddenly stopped receiving 30 minute files, and > are only getting daily files now. We are getting data fine. and did not > made any changes on our side here. > > Do you think something in their pqact got changed? > > Thank you for your help in this puzzle. > > Cheers, Maggie > > > This is a message Teresa sent to Kirk: > > Kirk, > > It would be useful to see your ldmd.conf entry as well as the > pqact.conf. > we have always formed daily files for all the sites and the seconds > field is dropped in these daily file names. Its also possible that > your ldm is timing out for the SA09 data because its 1 second data. > Shouldn't be a problem from UCAR to FSL, but you might check with your > people to see if your ftp traffic has increased. I dont think we've > made any LDM changes this week, certainly we haven't changed anything > for only the sa09 station. If you are timing out that should also > show in your ldmd.log file. I have the sa09 files coming in at 08 and > 38 instead of 05 and 35 to try to reduce the data volume and thats > working on our end. > Teresa > > > > Jeff Weber wrote: > > > Maggie, > > > > Quite perplexing... > > > > Does Kirk manage SA09? > > > > The only thing I can think of is that a change occurred in their ingest > > script, but that would not explain how some of them get the full prod > > name. > > > > What do the last 5 numbers represent? > > > > Is there any way to poke around on SA09? > > > > Sorry, not much help, but if we can get some more info maybe we can > > diagnose... > > > > Thanks, > > > > -Jeff > > ____________________________ _____________________ > > Jeff Weber address@hidden > > Unidata Support PH:303-497-8676 > > COMET Case Study Library FX:303-497-8690 > > University Corp for Atmospheric Research 3300 Mitchell Ln > > http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/staff/jweber Boulder,Co 80307-3000 > > ________________________________________ ______________________ > > > > On Fri, 18 Apr 2003, Unidata Support wrote: > > > > > >>------- Forwarded Message > >> > >> > >>>To: Unidata Support <address@hidden> > >>>cc: Kirk Holub <address@hidden>, > >>>cc: "Teresa Van Hove (E-mail)" <address@hidden>, > >>>cc: Jebb Stewart <address@hidden>, > >>>cc: Mike Bowden <address@hidden>, > >>>cc: Seth Gutman <address@hidden>, > >>>cc: Susan Sahm <address@hidden> > >>>From: Maggie Sleziak <address@hidden> > >>>Subject: LDM question > >>>Organization: UCAR > >>>Keywords: 200304181843.h3IIhY7U022031 > >>> > >>Hello, > >> > >>Kirk Holub from NOAA FSL has stopped receiving 30 minute files for two > >>Suominet sites. We are receiving data fine every 30 minutes, therefore > >>we think that this might be an LDM related issue. > >> > >>Below is the message from Kirk referring to their LDM log, I would > >>appreciate any advice of what could be causing the problem. > >> > >>Thank you very much, > >>Maggie > >> > >>Kirk Holub wrote: > >> > >> > >>>Maggie, > >>> > >>>Thanks for the info. > >>> > >>>It appears that something changed with LDM early in the day on April 13th. > >>> Here is a snippet from our LDM log: > >>> > >>>pr 12 13:36:14 gpsdata2 pqact[27994]: file: -close > >>>/cors/rinex/rawdata/sa09/sa09_16035_sa09_1213-6-46800.bnx > >>>Apr 12 13:36:14 gpsdata2 pqact[27994]: unio_prodput: 1 > >>>sa09_16035_sa09_1213-6-46800.bnx > >>>Apr 12 14:06:16 gpsdata2 pqact[27994]: 21a43f094b2f2ac3be4d3c8c6c565b40 > >>>480083 20030412140605.477 AFOS 000 sa09_16035_sa09_1213-6-48601.bnx > >>>Apr 12 14:06:16 gpsdata2 pqact[27994]: file: -close > >>>/cors/rinex/rawdata/sa09/sa09_16035_sa09_1213-6-48601.bnx > >>>Apr 12 14:06:17 gpsdata2 pqact[27994]: unio_prodput: 1 > >>>sa09_16035_sa09_1213-6-48601.bnx > >>>Apr 13 09:58:03 gpsdata2 pqact[27994]: c07d10d4fd5feae613905e0723f064fd > >>>698165 20030413095744.191 AFOS 000 sa09_16035_sa09_1213-6.bnx > >>>Apr 13 09:58:03 gpsdata2 pqact[27994]: file: -close > >>>/cors/rinex/rawdata/sa09/sa09_16035_sa09_1213-6.bnx > >>>Apr 13 09:58:03 gpsdata2 pqact[27994]: unio_prodput: 1 > >>>sa09_16035_sa09_1213-6.bnx > >>>Apr 14 09:57:59 gpsdata2 pqact[27994]: 4f009d46bd9ea1c34ccf871979a49365 > >>>786252 20030414095741.336 AFOS 000 sa09_16035_sa09_1214-0.bnx > >>> > >>>Notice: > >>>Apr 12 14:06:17 gpsdata2 pqact[27994]: unio_prodput: 1 > >>>sa09_16035_sa09_1213-6-48601.bnx > >>> > >>>versus: > >>>Apr 13 09:58:03 gpsdata2 pqact[27994]: unio_prodput: 1 > >>>sa09_16035_sa09_1213-6.bnx > >>> > >>>The '-' and last 5 numbers before the .bnx have vanished. > >>> > >>> > >>>When I grepped for 'unio_pro' in our most recent log I see: > >>>Apr 12 07:06:25 gpsdata2 pqact[27994]: unio_prodput: 1 > >>>sa09_16035_sa09_1213-6-23400.bnx > >>>Apr 12 07:36:26 gpsdata2 pqact[27994]: unio_prodput: 1 > >>>sa09_16035_sa09_1213-6-25200.bnx > >>>Apr 12 08:06:28 gpsdata2 pqact[27994]: unio_prodput: 1 > >>>sa09_16035_sa09_1213-6-27000.bnx > >>>Apr 12 08:36:29 gpsdata2 pqact[27994]: unio_prodput: 1 > >>>sa09_16035_sa09_1213-6-28800.bnx > >>>Apr 12 09:06:35 gpsdata2 pqact[27994]: unio_prodput: 1 > >>>sa09_16035_sa09_1213-6-30601.bnx > >>>Apr 12 09:36:31 gpsdata2 pqact[27994]: unio_prodput: 1 > >>>sa09_16035_sa09_1213-6-32401.bnx > >>>Apr 12 09:57:59 gpsdata2 pqact[27994]: unio_prodput: 1 > >>>sa09_16035_sa09_1213-5.bnx > >>>Apr 12 10:06:33 gpsdata2 pqact[27994]: unio_prodput: 1 > >>>sa09_16035_sa09_1213-6-34201.bnx > >>>Apr 12 10:36:35 gpsdata2 pqact[27994]: unio_prodput: 1 > >>>sa09_16035_sa09_1213-6-36000.bnx > >>>Apr 12 11:06:37 gpsdata2 pqact[27994]: unio_prodput: 1 > >>>sa09_16035_sa09_1213-6-37800.bnx > >>>Apr 12 11:36:38 gpsdata2 pqact[27994]: unio_prodput: 1 > >>>sa09_16035_sa09_1213-6-39601.bnx > >>>Apr 12 12:06:46 gpsdata2 pqact[27994]: unio_prodput: 1 > >>>sa09_16035_sa09_1213-6-41400.bnx > >>>Apr 12 12:36:41 gpsdata2 pqact[27994]: unio_prodput: 1 > >>>sa09_16035_sa09_1213-6-43200.bnx > >>>Apr 12 13:06:46 gpsdata2 pqact[27994]: unio_prodput: 1 > >>>sa09_16035_sa09_1213-6-45000.bnx > >>>Apr 12 13:36:14 gpsdata2 pqact[27994]: unio_prodput: 1 > >>>sa09_16035_sa09_1213-6-46800.bnx > >>>Apr 12 14:06:17 gpsdata2 pqact[27994]: unio_prodput: 1 > >>>sa09_16035_sa09_1213-6-48601.bnx > >>>Apr 13 09:58:03 gpsdata2 pqact[27994]: unio_prodput: 1 > >>>sa09_16035_sa09_1213-6.bnx > >>>Apr 14 09:57:59 gpsdata2 pqact[27994]: unio_prodput: 1 > >>>sa09_16035_sa09_1214-0.bnx > >>>Apr 15 09:57:54 gpsdata2 pqact[27994]: unio_prodput: 1 > >>>sa09_16035_sa09_1214-1.bnx > >>>Apr 16 09:57:49 gpsdata2 pqact[27994]: unio_prodput: 3 > >>>sa09_16035_sa09_1214-2.bnx > >>>Apr 17 09:58:22 gpsdata2 pqact[27994]: unio_prodput: 3 > >>>sa09_16035_sa09_1214-3.bnx > >>>Apr 18 09:57:56 gpsdata2 pqact[27994]: unio_prodput: 3 > >>>sa09_16035_sa09_1214-4.bnx > >>> > >>>Notice that we are only receiving one file at 09:[57 or 58] each day. So, > >>>are you aware of any LDM changes on your side which could be causing this? > >>> > >>>Or pqact.conf entry is: > >>>AFOS ^([Ss][Aa]09)(.*)(.bnx) FILE -close > >>>/cors/rinex/rawdata/sa09/\1\2\3 > >>> > >>>So, I do not see why the final '-*****' portion is being dropped from the > >>>file name. > >>> > >>>Any insight would be appreciated. > >>> > >>>Thanks. > >>> > >>>--Kirk > >>> > >>> > >>>>============================================================== > >>>>* Kirk Holub * > >>>>* NOAA Forecast Systems Laboratory * > >>>>* GPS-IPW Project -- <http://gpsmet.noaa.gov> * > >>>>* * > >>>>* 303-497-6642 (Voice) NOAA, R/FS3 * > >>>>* 303-497-6014 (Fax) 325 Broadway * > >>>>* 303-748-6390 (Cell/Page) Boulder, CO 80305-3328 * > >>>>============================================================== > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > >>-- > >>Maggie Sleziak > >>Programmer Tech > >>GST Cosmic UCAR/NCAR > >>address@hidden > >> > >> > >>------- End of Forwarded Message > >> > >> > >> > > > -- > Maggie Sleziak > Programmer Tech > GST Cosmic UCAR/NCAR > address@hidden > >