This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
> Hi Ed, > > Thank you for making this documentation available. You > may ignore (close) my other ticket. I solved all the problems > with f77 and f90 implementations. I already release > a new version of ROMS with parallel I/O. ROMS has > very complex I/O with multiple NetCDF files for > input and output. > That's wonderful. Can you tell me more about the parallel ROMS? Do you work with the ROMS model a lot? Where will you be releasing it? How did the parallelization go? We you able to achieve much speedup? Would you mind sending me your parallelized ROMS so that I can benchmark it? ROMS has been used before for this purpose with parallel HDF5, so it would be interesting to see a comparison. > The only issue remaining is that the NF90_COLLECTIVE > and NF90_INDEPENDENT is not referenced in netcdf.mod. Thanks for pointing this out. I have added them and they are in the latest snapshot release: ftp://ftp.unidata.ucar.edu/pub/netcdf/snapshot/netcdf-4-daily.tar.gz I have also added a F77 and a F90 test program for the parallel functions. See the snapshot documentation for more info and examples. http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf/docs_snapshot/netcdf-f90.html > > I found out that this like C logic statement where I > can use access=0 for independent and any number > (positive or negative; integer or floating point) > for collective. Yes, that is correct. Thanks! Ed Ticket Details =================== Ticket ID: VLE-656568 Department: Support netCDF Priority: High Status: Closed