[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 20051117: netCDF Fortran (77 + 90) - why...???????????

This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.

  • Subject: Re: 20051117: netCDF Fortran (77 + 90) - why...???????????
  • Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 08:25:24 -0700
Unidata Support <address@hidden> writes:

> ------- Forwarded Message
>
>>To: address@hidden
>>From: "giulia clai" <address@hidden>
>>Subject: netCDF Fortran (77 + 90) - why...???????????
>>Organization: ?
>>Keywords: 200511172226.jAHMQAdN019482 netCDF build
>
> Institution: enea
> Package Version: 3.6
> Operating System: linux suse9.2
> Hardware Information: pentium 4
> Inquiry: why does it happen, that if I write from the promt line:
>
> source ~/local/bin/ifortvars.sh 
> sh-3.00$ export CPPFLAGS=-DpgiFortran
> sh-3.00$ export FC=ifort
> sh-3.00$ export FFLAGS="-g -O2 -mp -recursive"
> sh-3.00$ ./configure
> ...........
>
> everything runs good, and if I write the same :
>
> export CPPFLAGS=-DpgiFortran
> export FC=ifort
> export FFLAGS="-g -O2 -mp -recursive"
>
> in my .profile, then the make test fails?
>
>

Sorry, shell issues on your machine will likely not be solved from
this end.

However, if you can get netcdf to compile and pass tests, that's good!

Thanks,

Ed
-- 
Ed Hartnett  -- address@hidden