This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
------- Forwarded Message Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 08:38:32 -0600 From: Mike Folk <address@hidden> To: "Ted Habermann" <address@hidden>, address@hidden, address@hidden, Brand Fortner <address@hidden> cc: address@hidden Subject: Re: HDF and netCDF Hi Ted. Great to hear from you. Russ's reply captures the differences extremely well, I think, so I won't confuse things with yet another version. Just a couple of additions: One thing about HDF5 that has been relevant for certain users: HDF5 can store large *numbers* of objects. Whereas the old HDF could store a maximum of 64,000 of any given object (and only 20,000 datasets (SDS)), HDF5 can store 2^31-1 or 2^64-1 objects, depending on how the file is created. And about netCDF I would add that in my view the netCDF data model is more closely suited to the context in which many scientists view their data. I would say it's a more scientifically powerful data model for a very wide range of applications. This is why we would really love to offer the netCDF API to HDF5 users. Mike At 01:40 PM 11/19/2002, Ted Habermann wrote: >Hello all, > >A blast from the distant past. Hope all of you are well and doing >interesting things! I have been asked to gather information comparing >HDF and netCDF for scientific data archives. This group must be able to >point me towards some up to date comparisons... > >Thanks, >Ted Habermann -- Mike Folk, Scientific Data Tech (HDF) http://hdf.ncsa.uiuc.edu NCSA/U of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 217-244-0647 voice 605 E. Springfield Ave., Champaign IL 61820 217-244-1987 fax ------- End of Forwarded Message