[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 20010502: Problem with netcdf-3.5.0 under Cygwin/Windows98

This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.

  • Subject: Re: 20010502: Problem with netcdf-3.5.0 under Cygwin/Windows98
  • Date: Wed, 02 May 2001 10:07:34 -0600
>From: "addisu" <address@hidden>
>Subject: Problem with netcdf-3.5.0
>Organization: ?
>Keywords: 200105020914.f429Esp21635 netCDF 3.5.0 Cygwin

Hi,

> I have encountred the following error in the installation process of =
> netcdf-3.5.0. in my PC under windows 98 version=20
> in the emulated unix version installed in my PC.(Cygwin)
> 
> Here are the necessary files that helps you to pin point my problem:
> 
> Error occurs after  running make test
> 
> (A.)
> CYGWIN_98-4.10 RK7VD 1.1.8(0.34/3/2) 2001-01-31 10:08 i586 unknown
> 
> (B.)
> 
>  VERSION: 3.5.0
> 
> (C.)
> 
>  Path for compilers:
> 
> C:\cygwin\bin\GCC.EXE 72704 04:10 03-26-2001
> 
> C:\cygwin\bin\GCC.EXE 72704 04:10 03-26-2001
> 
> c:\LF9555\BIN\LF95.EXE 108544 11:02 04-19-1999

 ...

> cmp test.nc test_nc.sav
> 
> test.nc test_nc.sav differ: char 1545, line 5

We had another user report a similar test failure on a Cygwin system:

 http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/glimpse/netcdf/4180

but subsequent tests showed everything seemed to be working OK despite
this test failure:

 http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/glimpse/netcdf/4181

Another user reported that with his version of Cygwin, everything
built and ran OK "out of the box":

  Running Windows 2000 on a 4000 Mhz Dell laptop, I instaled the
  latest cygwin yesterday (4/18/01), and just download netcdf
  3.5.0. Just did

  ./configure
  ./make
  ./make test

  and all worked fine out of the tarball. So, I'm not able to
  reproduce Carl's problem. Consider updating your cygwin environment
  if you haven't done so recently.

So we don't know exactly why some Cygwin installations seem to report
this difference, but apparently the libraries build OK, and you should
be able to install and use them.

--Russ

_____________________________________________________________________

Russ Rew                                         UCAR Unidata Program
address@hidden                     http://www.unidata.ucar.edu