[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 19990922: NETCDF Build on C90

This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.

  • Subject: Re: 19990922: NETCDF Build on C90
  • Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 14:48:03 -0600
George,

>Date: Wed, 22 Sep 1999 13:44:47 -0700
>From: "G_Shayne" <address@hidden>
>Organization: Microsoft Corporation
>To: "Steve Emmerson" <address@hidden>
>Subject: Re: 19990922: NETCDF Build on C90 
>Keywords: 199909212014.OAA06054

In the above message, you wrote:

> The exit code using the -dp option was 0.  If that is the basis for the
> nf_test failures, then why was the -dp switch seen as each routine compiled?
> Is there another segment of the make process where it might have been
> ignored, such as for the library build?  I checked the value of $FFLAGS
> before and after and it was always '-F -dp'.

In order to answer these questions, I'll need to set the files
"configure.log", "make.log", and "test.log" from your most recent
attempt (the one where you used the "-dp" option).  Would you please
send them to me.

--------
Steve Emmerson   <http://www.unidata.ucar.edu>