This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
>To: "Russ Rew" <address@hidden> >Subject: netCDF to XML >Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 10:26:57 +1000 >Organization: Research & Development, Geoterrex-Dighem Pty Limited, AUSTRALIA >Keywords: 199903150327.UAA24865 Hi Dr. Wolfgram, > Geoterrex-Dighem is the largest airborne geophysical survey contractor for > the mining industry with offices and operations all over the world. Detailed > information on us can be found at http://www.geoterrex.com > > We have started an initiative to establish an Airborne Geophysical Data > Exchange AGDE) standard and we are looking seriously at netCDF as the > platform for this definition. > > One of the major issues during this development is the upgrade path to XML. > We would like to get a realistic idea of the importance that Unidata is > attaching to the tasks that you have specified in your "to do" list (as > posted on your website): > > (1) design XML conventions and DTD for representing netCDF data, IDD data > products, decoded data products > > (2) design and implement a netCDFtoXML utility analogous to ncdump to dump > netCDF data in XML form instead of CDL > > (3) design and implement XMLtonetCDF to reverse the process of netCDFtoXML > > It would be great to get an idea about the timeframe for your development. > Also, any further comments would be appreciated. We haven't actually started any of the XML work yet. Only one other netCDF users has shown any interest in XML, so it hasn't been high on our priority list. I'm the one here who is most interested in this, but when I last looked at it, it was not clear to me when to use XML attributes versus XML elements, for example <dimension name=level size=10 /> versus <dimension> <name>level</name> <size>10</size> </dimension> I put the project aside until I could learn enough about XML to understand the tradeoffs between these two different forms of XML representation and whether we should try to specify a DTD for netCDF. That's still the status of this project. By now, there may be much better resources than the XML specification for learning about XML, which is what I was trying to work from earlier. With all the XML support in things like Sun's Project X and the IBM XML stuff available, this may be a good time to create something like this. I'm afraid I still can't give you any firm time frame for this, but at least one other user is looking into netCDF/XML issues may have made some progress, Jim Secan <address@hidden> from Northwest Research Associates. I'm CC:ing him on this reply, in case he's gotten further ... --Russ _____________________________________________________________________ Russ Rew UCAR Unidata Program address@hidden http://www.unidata.ucar.edu