This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
On May 16, 12:54pm, Russ Rew wrote: > Hi, > > We have an SX-4 user in Germany who is trying to use netcdf-3.3. > However, he is trying to use it under SUPER-UX R6.1 and it was > compiled for R6.2. He is not able to compile it successfully > under R6.1. He will be upgrading SUPER-UX to R7.1 soon. So my > question is: do you have a version working under SUPER-UX R7.1 > and do you know when it will be available? > > Best Regards, > > Susan > > - - -- > - - -------------------------------------------------------------- > Susan Kraus 4200 Research Forest Drive, Suite 400 > NEC Systems Lab, Inc. The Woodlands, TX 77381-4257 > Houston Supercomputer Center (281) 465-1505 phone > address@hidden (281) 465-1599 fax The most recent work I've done with the SX-4 is on sx4.hstc.necsyl.com in /home/cust/ncar1/netcdf-3.3beta. (There are no relevant differences between the "beta" there and the release you find at our ftp site.) This system is at 7.1 now, and I presume it was last week when we did the build. I did not notice that there had been an upgrade, the SX-4 information in our INSTALL document says 6.2 incorrectly. Otherwise, we the info in the INSTALL document represents the current state of affairs. There are some problems with the _new_ fortran interface and perhaps 'ncgen -f'. Programs which use the netcdf-2 fortran interface (eg, any existing netcdf FORTRAN programs) should work. The objects in /home/cust/ncar1/netcdf-3.3a may be from SUPER-UX 6.2, check the dates. For programs using the netcdf-2 interface, it is not significantly different from the current release. We have some open issues with your NEC engineering staff, particularly a problem with the C preprocessor, which inhibit our ability to verify the port to SX-4. Greg Neill (address@hidden) has be sheparding this through. Hope this helps. -glenn