This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
Hi Rich: It is an error in the CFSR files (they have lots). We have a workaround in NcML and if served from the TDS. Can you live with that? John > Lansing, > > I was expecting you to say that this issue was a bug in the GRIB > reader, and it would get a ticket to be fixed. But I think you are > saying that the data was written wrong, and therefore the issue will > not be fixed? > > This is one of those "big deal" datasets that it would be great to > read correctly. > http://rda.ucar.edu/pub/cfsr.html > > It's good to know that NcML can fix the issue for a file, but there > are hundreds of these, so I would be better to fix the reader if you > can. > > Thanks, > -Rich > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Unidata netCDF Java Support > <address@hidden> wrote: > >> Lansing, > >> > >> It looks like you are using ToolsUI 4.2, not ToolsUI 4.3. In toolsUI > >> 4.2, you see one variable, but the times are wrong. In 4.3, you see > >> two variables with correct times, but we want one variable with > >> correct time! > >> > >> Try this: > >> http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf-java/v4.3/webstart/netCDFtools.jnlp > >> > >> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Unidata netCDF Java Support > >> <address@hidden> wrote: > >> >> NetCDF-Java folks: > >> >> > >> >> There appears to be a bug in the GRIB2 decoding problem using > >> >> NetCDF-Java 4.3 on some of the surface pressure data we got from > >> >> http://rda.ucar.edu/pub/cfsr.html > >> >> > >> >> This data is supposed to have a single variable (pressure) with > >> >> uniform hourly sampling, but when we bring it up in NetCDF 4.3 tools, > >> >> we see two variables instead of one, with the 1st having a uniform > >> >> time base of 6 hours (0,6,12), and the 2nd having a non-uniform time > >> >> base that fills in the rest of the hourly data (1,2,3,4,5 > >> >> 7,8,9,10,11 13,14...) > >> >> > >> >> Screenshot: http://screencast.com/t/DWEgKMfy > >> >> > >> >> I put a sample file here: > >> >> http://geoport.whoi.edu/thredds/catalog/usgs/data1/rsignell/test/catalog.html?dataset=usgs/data1/rsignell/test/pressfc.gdas.199801.grb2 > >> >> > >> >> Thanks, > >> >> Rich > >> >> -- > >> >> Dr. Richard P. Signell (508) 457-2229 > >> >> USGS, 384 Woods Hole Rd. > >> >> Woods Hole, MA 02543-1598 > >> >> > >> >> > >> > Hello Rich, > >> > > >> > I'm not sure what's going on, but I tried your file and saw only one > >> > variable reported. I've attached a screenshot from NetCDF-Java ToolsUI. > >> > Maybe I'm missing something obvious here? > >> > > >> > Regards, > >> > Lansing Madry > >> > Unidata > >> > Boulder, Colorado > >> > > >> > Ticket Details > >> > =================== > >> > Ticket ID: PYP-475421 > >> > Department: Support netCDF Java > >> > Priority: Normal > >> > Status: Open > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Dr. Richard P. Signell (508) 457-2229 > >> USGS, 384 Woods Hole Rd. > >> Woods Hole, MA 02543-1598 > >> > >> > > Rich, > > > > Thanks for educating me on 4.2 vs. 4.3 -- details, details! > > > > I dug a little deeper to see what is going on with the data in the file you > > sent. It looks like, at the byte level, there are some differences that > > 4.2 conveniently ignored and 4.3 notices. Specifically, if you look at the > > file in the iosp/GRIB2/GRIB2Collection tab, you'll notice that two > > variables seem to show up, with separate GDS hash codes. In that view, if > > you look down to the Grib2GridDefinitionSection, highlight a row, > > right-click on the row, and select "Show GDS", you'll see the information > > for Lo2 differs for the two "different" variables: > > > > Lo2 - longitude of last grid point == 359687000 > > Lo2 - longitude of last grid point == 359688000 > > > > This is really a defect in how the data was written out - perhaps a > > rounding error somewhere, or some other loss of precision. > > > > In the meantime, you can "correct" the issue using a bit of NcML to change > > the GDS hashcode. Details are here: > > > > http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf-java/formats/GribFiles.html > > > > and I've tried this bit of NcML and found it to work in this case: > > > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> > > <netcdf xmlns="http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/namespaces/netcdf/ncml-2.2" > > location="C:/Users/madry/rsignell/pressfc.gdas.199801.grb2"> > > <iospParam> > > <gdsHash from="1450192070" to="1450218978"/> > > </iospParam> > > </netcdf> > > > > However, you will need to delete the associated .ncx file before opening > > this NcML file in the toolsUI-4.3 viewer. > > > > Let me know if this doesn't work for you, and I'll take another crack at it. > > > > Cheers, > > Lansing > > > > Ticket Details > > =================== > > Ticket ID: PYP-475421 > > Department: Support netCDF Java > > Priority: Normal > > Status: Open > > > > > > -- > Dr. Richard P. Signell (508) 457-2229 > USGS, 384 Woods Hole Rd. > Woods Hole, MA 02543-1598 > > Ticket Details =================== Ticket ID: PYP-475421 Department: Support netCDF Java Priority: Normal Status: Open