This archive contains answers to questions sent to Unidata support through mid-2025. Note that the archive is no longer being updated. We provide the archive for reference; many of the answers presented here remain technically correct, even if somewhat outdated. For the most up-to-date information on the use of NSF Unidata software and data services, please consult the Software Documentation first.
Hi Mike, re: > Sorry it's taken me so long to get back to you, we got pretty busy here > after the holidays. Here also :-) re: > I installed mcidas2017b this morning and everything went well. That last > issue I wrote you about appears to have been resolved, and so far I haven't > run into anything else. I'll let you know if I catch anything, but I'm > pretty optimistic that all is well. :D I'm using v2017.b to create the GOES-East and -West sectors in the Unidata-Wisconsin (UNIWISC aka MCIDAS) IDD datastream. Part of my testing for this was to IMGREMAP the NOAAPort-delivered GOES-16 imagery into the GVAR-based GOES-East sectors, and this worked with no apparent problems. I am using the GRB-delivered GOES-16 imagery for "production" as the GRB Full Disk image resolutions are actually less (worse) than the sectors that have been in the UNIWISC feed for many years. re: > While I'm here I have a couple of questions. Though I haven't had the > chance to play with any of it yet, I was excited to see that Unidata is > providing data from all of the other instruments over LDM. Yup. Not many have signed up for this yet, but we expect things to change after AMS. re: > My understanding is McIDAS can handle GLM data no problem, SSEC wrote an ADDE server for the GLM data, so there is support. Talking to the SSEC developer about this (and a LOT of other things) yesterday made me aware that there is still work to be done in the GLM data serving. re: > can the same be > said for the other instruments (I suppose SUVI would be the next most > likely product to plot with McIDAS)? No. There is no support for the space weather instruments or magnetometer, and I don't think that SSEC has any interest in adding support. re: > And Paul had another question for you, though I suspect this would really > be more for SSEC. Do you know how often some of the GIS layers are updated > in McIDAS? GIS "layers"? Are you asking about McIDAS-V (where they use the term "layers" to describe overlays), or are you talking about McIDAS-X? re: > For example, I-355 near us had an extension built nearly a > decade ago, between I-55 and I-80, but it doesn't seem to be included in > the software. I'm sure it would take a fair amount of work to update > layers like that, but because that prior example literally hits close to > home it's been a curiosity of ours for a while. If there is a good, up to date map database to start with, new McIDAS-X map files can usually be created without excessive effort. The key is the format of the up to date map database... there is no routine in McIDAS that understands shape files, for instance. Whether or not SSEC has written a non-McIDAS utility to convert map shape files into McIDAS OUT* files is unknown to me. Cheers, Tom -- **************************************************************************** Unidata User Support UCAR Unidata Program (303) 497-8642 P.O. Box 3000 address@hidden Boulder, CO 80307 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unidata HomePage http://www.unidata.ucar.edu **************************************************************************** Ticket Details =================== Ticket ID: JGN-249914 Department: Support McIDAS Priority: Normal Status: Closed =================== NOTE: All email exchanges with Unidata User Support are recorded in the Unidata inquiry tracking system and then made publicly available through the web. If you do not want to have your interactions made available in this way, you must let us know in each email you send to us.